IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/16931_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Janus-faced law: A philosophical debate

In: The Timing of Lawmaking

Author

Listed:
  • Martha C. Nussbaum

Abstract

Should law look backward toward time-honored traditions, or forward toward the promotion of social welfare? In this chapter I study the debate between Burkean traditionalists (along with their legal allies) and the British Utilitarians, who find in tradition not wisdom but irrationality and exclusion, and who propose to remodel law along lines of scientific rationality, counting each person equally and promoting aggregate welfare. I examine the strongest arguments for each side and propose a compromise. Keywords: common law, Utilitarianism, Burke, Bentham, Mill, Sidgwick, Holmes, Cardozo

Suggested Citation

  • Martha C. Nussbaum, 2017. "Janus-faced law: A philosophical debate," Chapters, in: Frank Fagan & Saul Levmore (ed.), The Timing of Lawmaking, chapter 11, pages 249-279, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:16931_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781785364327.00019.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santiago Mejia, 2022. "Socratic Ignorance and Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 537-553, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economics and Finance; Law - Academic;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:16931_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.