IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14178_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The scientific research process

In: Structuring Public–Private Research Partnerships for Success

Author

Listed:
  • .

Abstract

We evaluate two competing paradigms for modeling the scientific research process: the linear decomposition paradigm and the non-linear, chaotic, feedback research paradigm. The assessment of research paradigms is not simply an academic exercise, as each paradigm has important implications for universities contemplating public–private research partnerships. The two alternative paradigms have direct implications for whether public or private goods emerge from the research and development process.

Suggested Citation

  • ., 2016. "The scientific research process," Chapters, in: Structuring Public–Private Research Partnerships for Success, chapter 2, pages 17-26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14178_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781849805742.00006.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bayer, Benjamin, 2018. "Experience with auctions for wind power in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2644-2658.
    2. Chamseddine Guizani & Mejdi Jeguirim & Sylvie Valin & Lionel Limousy & Sylvain Salvador, 2017. "Biomass Chars: The Effects of Pyrolysis Conditions on Their Morphology, Structure, Chemical Properties and Reactivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Zandri Koekemoer, 2019. "Gender and financial well-being of South African investors," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 9511448, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    4. Wenqiang Sun & Yuhao Hong & Yanhui Wang, 2016. "Operation Optimization of Steam Accumulators as Thermal Energy Storage and Buffer Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14178_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.