IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/bis/bisifc/55-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A typology of captive financial institutions and money lenders (sector S127) in Luxembourg

In: New developments in central bank statistics around the world

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Di Filippo
  • Frédéric Pierret

Abstract

The paper presents a typology of captive financial institutions and money lenders (sector S127) in Luxembourg. Given data availability, the analysis relies on a sub-sample of the whole population of S127 firms. This sub-sample features S127 firms whose total assets are at least equal to EUR 500 million. As of Q4 2018, this sub-sample represents about 5% of the total number of S127 firms in Luxembourg, and about 85% of the total assets held by S127 firms in Luxembourg. The period of analysis spans Q4 2014 to Q4 2019. In terms of number and on average over the period Q4 2014 – Q4 2019, the sample of S127 corporations regroups holding corporations (42%), intragroup lending companies (25%), mixed structures (19%), conduits (7%) and loan origination companies (4%). These corporations represent about 98% of the total number of S127 companies whose total assets of at least EUR 500 million. The remaining types that complete the sample of S127 entities consist of captive factoring and invoicing corporations, companies with predominant non-financial assets, extra-group loan origination firms, wealth-holding entities and captive financial leasing corporations. In addition, on average over the period Q4 2014 – Q4 2019, holding corporations own the largest share of total assets (55%) followed by intragroup lending companies (22%), mixed structures (14%), conduits (6%) and loan origination companies (2%). These corporations account for about 99% of the total assets held by S127 companies whose total assets are at least equal to EUR 500 million. The relative importance of holding corporations, intragroup lending companies, mixed structures, conduits and loan origination companies suggests that Luxembourg plays the role of a global financial centre for MNEs. The latter benefit from Luxembourg as a financial platform to manage their business activities and structure their corporate investments.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Di Filippo & Frédéric Pierret, 2021. "A typology of captive financial institutions and money lenders (sector S127) in Luxembourg," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), New developments in central bank statistics around the world, volume 55, Bank for International Settlements.
    • Handle: RePEc:bis:bisifc:55-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/ifc/publ/ifcb55_21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John H. Dunning & Sarianna M. Lundan, 2008. "Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Second Edition," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3215.
    2. Asier Cornejo Pérez & Javier Huerga, 2016. "The Centralised Securities Database (CSDB) - Standardised micro data for financial stability purposes," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Combining micro and macro data for financial stability analysis, volume 41, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Charles Cadestin & Koen De Backer & Isabelle Desnoyers-James & Sébastien Miroudot & Ming Ye & Davide Rigo, 2018. "Multinational enterprises and global value chains: New Insights on the trade-investment nexus," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/05, OECD Publishing.
    4. World Bank, 2020. "World Development Report 2020," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 32437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriele Di Filippo & Frédéric Pierret, 2023. "A typology of captive financial institutions in Luxembourg: lessons from a new database," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Post-pandemic landscape for central bank statistics, volume 58, Bank for International Settlements.
    2. Di Filippo, Gabriele & Pierret, Frédéric, 2020. "Key Features of Captive Financial Institutions and Money Lenders (sector S127) in Luxembourg," MPRA Paper 111872, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2020.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pol Antràs, 2020. "De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age," NBER Working Papers 28115, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Tsakanikas, Aggelos & Caloghirou, Yannis & Dimas, Petros & Stamopoulos, Dimitrios, 2022. "Intangibles, innovation, and sector specialization in global value chains: A case study on the EU's and the UK's manufacturing industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Jordaan,Jacob Arie & Douw,Willem & Qiang,Zhenwei, 2020. "Multinational Corporation Affiliates, Backward Linkages, and Productivity Spillovers in Developing and Emerging Economies : Evidence and Policy Making," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9364, The World Bank.
    4. Yan, Yunfeng & Wang, Ran & Chen, Sida & Wang, Feifan & Zhao, Zhongxiu, 2022. "Mapping carbon footprint along global value chains: A study based on firm heterogeneity in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 398-408.
    5. Simola, Heli, 2021. "The impact of Covid-19 on global value chains," BOFIT Policy Briefs 2/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    6. Vujanović, Nina & Stojčić, Nebojša & Hashi, Iraj, 2021. "FDI spillovers and firm productivity during crisis: Empirical evidence from transition economies," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    7. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    8. Tran Minh Duc, 2022. "Research on gender in access to economic resources and labor market of ethnic minorities in Vietnam," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 646-653, August.
    9. Liu, Haiyun & Islam, Mollah Aminul & Khan, Muhammad Asif & Hossain, Md Ismail & Pervaiz, Khansa, 2020. "Does financial deepening attract foreign direct investment? Fresh evidence from panel threshold analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Ashis Kumar Pradhan & Gourishankar S Hiremath, 2020. "Do external commercial borrowings and financial development affect exports?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1796269-179, January.
    11. Dierk Herzer & Philipp Hühne & Peter Nunnenkamp, 2014. "FDI and Income Inequality—Evidence from Latin American Economies," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 778-793, November.
    12. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/6q707l4svn8k3bt630nhgdqgdu is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Thi Xuan Thu Nguyen & Javier Revilla Diez, 2017. "Multinational enterprises and industrial spatial concentration patterns in the Red River Delta and Southeast Vietnam," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 59(1), pages 101-138, July.
    14. Arvanitis, Spyros & Hollenstein, Heinz & Stucki, Tobias, 2016. "Does the explanatory power of the OLI approach differ among sectors and business functions? Evidence from firm-level data," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 10, pages 1-46.
    15. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman, 2020. "When Tariffs Disturb Global Supply Chains," NBER Working Papers 27722, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Mh Bala Subrahmanya, 2017. "HOW DID BANGALORE EMERGE AS A GLOBAL HUB OF TECH START-UPs IN INDIA? ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM — EVOLUTION, STRUCTURE AND ROLE," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Viengsaythong DALASENG & NIU Xiongying & Khaysy SRITHILAT, 2022. "Cross- Country Investigation of the Impact of Trade Openness and FDI on Economic Growth: A Case of Developing Countries," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 9(1), pages 49-73.
    18. Amar Gande & Kose John & Vinay B. Nair & Lemma W. Senbet, 2020. "Taxes, institutions, and innovation: Theory and international evidence," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1413-1442, December.
    19. Gammeltoft, Peter & Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro, 2021. "Enriching internationalization process theory: insights from the study of emerging market multinationals," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3).
    20. Bartha, Zoltán & S. Gubik, Andrea, 2014. "SME Internalisation Index (SMINI) Based on the Sample of the Visegrad Countries," MPRA Paper 57382, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jul 2014.
    21. Clampit, Jack & Gaffney, Nolan & Fabian, Frances & Stafford, Thomas, 2023. "Institutional misalignment and escape-based FDI: A prospect theory lens," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C80 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - General
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • L22 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Organization and Market Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisifc:55-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Fessler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.