IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pst331.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Anna Cartwright

Personal Details

First Name:Anna
Middle Name:
Last Name:Cartwright
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pst331
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://ac2020.pythonanywhere.com/about

Affiliation

Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics
Business School
Oxford Brookes University

Oxford, United Kingdom
http://business.brookes.ac.uk/about/departments/accounting-finance-economics/
RePEc:edi:deoxbuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Federica Alberti & Anna Cartwright & Edward Cartwright, 2021. "Predicting Efficiency in Threshold Public Good Games: A Learning Direction Theory Approach," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2021-01, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
  2. Edward Cartwright & Anna Stepanova, 2015. "Efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game," Studies in Economics 1506, School of Economics, University of Kent.
  3. Federica Alberti & Edward J. Cartwright & Anna Stepanova, 2012. "Threshold public good games and impulse balance theory," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-062, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
  4. Anna Stepanova, 2009. "R&D Spillovers, Concentration and Market Performance," Studies in Economics 0901, School of Economics, University of Kent.
  5. AMIR, Rabah & STEPANOVA, Anna, 2004. "Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand duopoly," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2004037, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  6. AMIR, Rabah & NANNERUP, Niels & STEPANOVA, Anna & EGUIAZAROVA, Elina, 2001. "Monopoly versus R&D-integrated duopoly," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2001051, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  7. Rabah Amir & Anna Stepanova, 2000. "First and Second Mover Advantage in Asymmetric Price Duopoly," Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers 1161, Econometric Society.

Articles

  1. Edward Cartwright & Anna Stepanova & Lian Xue, 2019. "Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(5), pages 903-922, October.
  2. Anna Cartwright & Edward Cartwright, 2019. "Ransomware and Reputation," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, June.
  3. Edward Cartwright & Anna Stepanova, 2017. "Efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1163-1191, November.
  4. Cartwright, Edward & Stepanova, Anna, 2015. "The consequences of a refund in threshold public good games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 29-33.
  5. Burr, Chrystie & Knauff, Malgorzata & Stepanova, Anna, 2013. "On the prisoner’s dilemma in R&D with input spillovers and incentives for R&D cooperation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 254-261.
  6. Edward Cartwright & Anna Stepanova, 2012. "What do Students Learn from a Classroom Experiment: Not much, Unless they Write a Report on it," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 48-57, January.
  7. Anna Stepanova & Antonio Tesoriere, 2011. "R&D With Spillovers: Monopoly Versus Noncooperative And Cooperative Duopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(1), pages 125-144, January.
  8. Amir, Rabah & Stepanova, Anna, 2006. "Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand duopoly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 1-20, April.
  9. Rabah Amir & Niels Nannerup & Anna Stepanova & Eline Eguiazarova, 2002. "Monopoly versus R&D‐integrated Duopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 70(1), pages 88-100, January.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 4 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (3) 2012-03-21 2015-05-09 2021-02-08
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (2) 2012-03-21 2015-05-09
  3. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (2) 2012-03-21 2015-05-09
  4. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2015-05-09
  5. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2009-03-07
  6. NEP-CSE: Economics of Strategic Management (1) 2009-03-07
  7. NEP-EDU: Education (1) 2009-03-07
  8. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2012-03-21
  9. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2009-03-07
  10. NEP-KNM: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy (1) 2009-03-07
  11. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (1) 2009-03-07
  12. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2009-03-07

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Anna Cartwright should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.