IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pku201.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Gijs van de Kuilen

Personal Details

First Name:Gijs
Middle Name:Van De
Last Name:Kuilen
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pku201
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://www.uvt.nl/webwijs/show/?uid=g.v.d.kuilen

Affiliation

CentER Graduate School for Economics and Business
School of Economics and Management
Universiteit van Tilburg

Tilburg, Netherlands
https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/research/economics-and-management/graduate-school
RePEc:edi:cekubnl (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. van Bruggen, Paul & Laeven, Roger J. A. & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2024. "Higher-Order Risk Attitudes for Non-Expected Utility," Discussion Paper 2024-019, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  2. Arthur Attema & Olivier L’haridon & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2019. "Measuring Multivariate Risk Preferences in the Health Domain," Post-Print halshs-01970236, HAL.
  3. Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2017. "The Strength of Sensitivity to Ambiguity," Working Papers 836, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
  4. Dengler, Sebastian & Gerlagh, Reyer & Trautmann, Stefan T. & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2017. "Climate Policy Commitment Devices," ETA: Economic Theory and Applications 263488, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  5. Breaban, Adriana & van de Kuilen, Gijs & Noussair, Charles, 2016. "Prudence, Personality, Cognitive Ability and Emotional State," Discussion Paper 2016-030, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  6. Krawczyk, Michal & Trautmann, Stefan T. & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2016. "Catastrophic risk : Social influences on insurance decisions," Other publications TiSEM 32c55717-0cd7-46b0-8f2b-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  7. Breaban, Adriana & Van De Kuilen, Gijs & Noussair, Charles N., 2016. "Prudence, emotional state, personality, and cognitive ability," Other publications TiSEM 0ac205ac-aee3-4df2-82ee-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  8. Ebert, Sebastian & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2015. "Experiments on bivariate risk preferences," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113055, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  9. Sujoy Mukerji & Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2014. "Discriminating between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: A Qualitative Test," Economics Series Working Papers 692, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  10. Trautmann, Stefan T. & van de Kuilen, Gijs & Zeckhauser, Richard J., 2013. "Social Class and Un(ethical) Behavior: A Framework, with Evidence from a Large Population Sample," Working Paper Series rwp13-004, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  11. Trautmann, Stefan T. & van de Kuilen, Gijs & Zeckhauser, Richard J., 2012. "Social Class and (Un)ethical Behavior: Evidence from a Large Population Sample," Working Paper Series rwp12-019, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
  12. Noussair, C.N. & Trautmann, S.T. & van de Kuilen, G. & Vellekoop, N., 2012. "Risk Aversion and Religion," Discussion Paper 2012-073, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  13. Trautmann, S.T. & van de Kuilen, G., 2011. "Belief Elicitation : A Horse Race among Truth Serums," Discussion Paper 2011-117, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  14. Noussair, C.N. & Trautmann, S.T. & van de Kuilen, G., 2011. "Higher Order Risk Attitudes, Demographics, and Financial Decisions," Discussion Paper 2011-055, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  15. van de Kuilen, G. & Wakker, P.P., 2011. "The midweight method to measure attitudes towards risk and ambiguity," Other publications TiSEM c58a6884-24cc-4cab-ae2f-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  16. Adam S. Booij & Bernard M.S. Van Praag & Gijs Van De Kuilen & Bernard M.S. van Praag, 2009. "A Parametric Analysis of Prospect Theory's Functionals for the General Population," CESifo Working Paper Series 2609, CESifo.
  17. Lammers, J. & van de Kuilen, G., 2007. "The HIV Anticaptory Saving Motive : An Empirical Analysis in South Africa," Discussion Paper 2007-51, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  18. Hessel Oosterbeek & Randolph Sloof & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2004. "Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis," Experimental 0401003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Articles

  1. Robin Cubitt & Gijs van de Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2020. "Discriminating Between Models of Ambiguity Attitude: a Qualitative Test," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 708-749.
  2. Attema, Arthur E. & l’Haridon, Olivier & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2019. "Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 15-24.
  3. Robin Cubitt & Gijs Kuilen & Sujoy Mukerji, 2018. "The strength of sensitivity to ambiguity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 275-302, October.
  4. Aurélien Baillon & Harris Schlesinger & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2018. "Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(2), pages 233-256, June.
  5. Trautmann, Stefan T. & Kuilen, Gijs van de, 2018. "Higher order risk attitudes: A review of experimental evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 108-124.
  6. Dengler, Sebastian & Gerlagh, Reyer & Trautmann, Stefan T. & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2018. "Climate policy commitment devices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 331-343.
  7. Michal W. Krawczyk & Stefan T. Trautmann & Gijs Kuilen, 2017. "Catastrophic risk: social influences on insurance decisions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 309-326, March.
  8. Stefan T. Trautmann & Gijs Kuilen, 2016. "Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: Experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 75-88, December.
  9. Stefan T. Trautmann & Gijs Kuilen, 2015. "Belief Elicitation: A Horse Race among Truth Serums," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(589), pages 2116-2135, December.
  10. Charles N. Noussair & Stefan T. Trautmann & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2014. "Higher Order Risk Attitudes, Demographics, and Financial Decisions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(1), pages 325-355.
  11. Charles Noussair & Stefan Trautmann & Gijs Kuilen & Nathanael Vellekoop, 2013. "Risk aversion and religion," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 165-183, October.
  12. Gijs van de Kuilen & Peter P. Wakker, 2011. "The Midweight Method to Measure Attitudes Toward Risk and Ambiguity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 582-598, March.
  13. Adam Booij & Bernard Praag & Gijs Kuilen, 2010. "A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 115-148, February.
  14. Gijs Kuilen, 2009. "Subjective Probability Weighting and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 1-22, July.
  15. Theo Offerman & Joep Sonnemans & Gijs Van De Kuilen & Peter P. Wakker, 2009. "A Truth Serum for Non-Bayesians: Correcting Proper Scoring Rules for Risk Attitudes ," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(4), pages 1461-1489.
  16. Booij, Adam S. & van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2009. "A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 651-666, August.
  17. Gijs Kuilen & Peter Wakker, 2006. "Learning in the Allais paradox," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 155-164, December.
  18. Hessel Oosterbeek & Randolph Sloof & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2004. "Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 171-188, June.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Rankings

This author is among the top 5% authors according to these criteria:
  1. Number of Citations, Discounted by Citation Age
  2. Breadth of citations across fields
  3. Wu-Index

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 16 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (10) 2004-11-07 2012-06-13 2014-01-17 2016-09-11 2017-01-08 2017-10-15 2017-10-15 2018-03-12 2018-03-12 2019-04-08. Author is listed
  2. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (8) 2009-04-25 2014-01-17 2017-01-08 2018-03-12 2018-03-12 2018-03-26 2019-03-11 2024-09-23. Author is listed
  3. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (7) 2004-11-07 2009-04-25 2012-06-13 2013-06-16 2016-09-11 2017-01-08 2018-03-12. Author is listed
  4. NEP-ENV: Environmental Economics (3) 2017-10-15 2017-10-15 2019-04-08
  5. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (3) 2012-06-13 2013-06-16 2016-09-11
  6. NEP-ENE: Energy Economics (2) 2017-10-15 2019-04-08
  7. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (2) 2016-09-11 2017-01-08
  8. NEP-AGE: Economics of Ageing (1) 2019-03-11
  9. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2018-02-26
  10. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2018-02-26
  11. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (1) 2019-03-11
  12. NEP-IAS: Insurance Economics (1) 2018-03-26
  13. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2018-02-26
  14. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2018-02-26
  15. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2017-10-15
  16. NEP-RES: Resource Economics (1) 2017-10-15
  17. NEP-RMG: Risk Management (1) 2019-03-11
  18. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (1) 2012-06-13

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Gijs Van De Kuilen should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.