IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pde929.html
   My authors  Follow this author

James Michael DeVault

Personal Details

First Name:James
Middle Name:Michael
Last Name:DeVault
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pde929
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Department of Economics
Lafayette College

Easton, Pennsylvania (United States)
http://economics.lafayette.edu/
RePEc:edi:delafus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. James DeVault, 2013. "Political polarization, congressional redistricting, and trade liberalization," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 207-221, October.
  2. James M. DeVault, 2010. "Swing Voting and Fast‐Track Authority," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 77(1), pages 63-77, July.
  3. James M. Devault, 2010. "Cafta, Campaign Contributions, And The Role Of Special Interests," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 282-297, November.
  4. James M. Devault, 2005. "The Political Economy of Trade Preferences," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(2), pages 278-285, April.
  5. De Vault, James M, 2002. "Congressional Dominance and the International Trade Commission," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 110(1-2), pages 1-22, January.
  6. James M. DeVault, 1997. "Offshore Assembly and the Dominican Republic," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 951-966, November.
  7. James Devault, 1996. "The welfare effects of U.S. antidumping duties," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 19-33, January.
  8. James Devault, 1996. "Competitive Need Limits And The U.S. Generalized System Of Preference," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 14(4), pages 58-66, October.
  9. James M. DeVault, 1996. "Political Pressure and the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 35-46, Winter.
  10. James Devault, 1990. "The Administration of US Antidumping Duties: Some Empirical Observations," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 75-88, March.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. James DeVault, 2013. "Political polarization, congressional redistricting, and trade liberalization," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 207-221, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Krapohl & Václav Ocelík & Dawid M. Walentek, 2021. "The instability of globalization: applying evolutionary game theory to global trade cooperation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 31-51, July.
    2. Daryna Grechyna, 2021. "Trade openness and political distortions," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 644-663, November.
    3. Stone, Daniel F., 2019. "“Unmotivated bias” and partisan hostility: Empirical evidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 12-26.

  2. James M. Devault, 2010. "Cafta, Campaign Contributions, And The Role Of Special Interests," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 282-297, November.

    Cited by:

    1. ITO Banri, 2018. "Trade Exposure and Electoral Protectionism: Evidence from Japanese politician-level data," Discussion papers 18034, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

  3. James M. Devault, 2005. "The Political Economy of Trade Preferences," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(2), pages 278-285, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Pokrivcak, Jan, 2007. "Economics and Political Economy of Regional Trade Agreements," Working Papers 7286, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.

  4. De Vault, James M, 2002. "Congressional Dominance and the International Trade Commission," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 110(1-2), pages 1-22, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Aquilante, Tommaso, 2018. "Undeflected pressure? The protectionist effect of political partisanship on US antidumping policy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 455-470.
    2. Benjamin Liebman & Kara M. Olson, 2004. "The Returns from Rent-Seeking: Campaign Contributions, Firm Subsidies, and the Byrd Amendment," International Trade 0408003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Nelson, Douglas, 2006. "The political economy of antidumping: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 554-590, September.
    4. Vivienne Born & Lee Warren Brown & Dinesh Hasija, 2024. "Who obtains political exemptions? An attention-based analysis of steel tariff exclusion requests," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 166-180, June.
    5. Aquilante, Tommaso, 2015. "Bureaucrats or Politicians? Political Parties and Antidumping in the US," MPRA Paper 70359, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  5. James M. DeVault, 1997. "Offshore Assembly and the Dominican Republic," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 951-966, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Liberato, Ana S.Q. & Fennell, Dana, 2007. "Gender and Well-being in the Dominican Republic: The Impact of Free Trade Zone Employment and Female Headship," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 394-409, March.

  6. James Devault, 1996. "The welfare effects of U.S. antidumping duties," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 19-33, January.

    Cited by:

    1. VANDENBUSSCHE, Hylke & ZANARDI, Maurizio, 2007. "What explains the proliferation of antidumping laws?," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007066, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Kokko, Ari & Gustavsson Tingvall, Patrik & Videnord, Josefin, 2017. "Which Antidumping Cases Reach the WTO?," Ratio Working Papers 286, The Ratio Institute.
    3. Bruce Blonigen & Thomas Prusa, 2003. "The Cost of Antidumping: the Devil is in the Details," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 233-245.
    4. Bruce A. Blonigen & KaSaundra Tomlin & Wesley W. Wilson, 2004. "Tariff‐jumping FDI and domestic firms’ profits," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 656-677, August.
    5. Zanardi, M., 2005. "Antidumping : A Problem in International Trade," Other publications TiSEM 4db69e8e-f10c-4098-a644-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Magdalene Silberberger & Anja Slany & Christian Soegaard & Frederik Stender, 2022. "The Aftermath of Anti-Dumping: Are Temporary Trade Barriers Really Temporary?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 677-704, September.
    7. Chang, Yang-Ming & Raza, Mian F., 2023. "Dumping, antidumping duties, and price undertakings," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 131-151.
    8. VANDENBUSSCHE, Hylke & ZANARDI, Maurizio, 2010. "The chilling trade effects of antidumping proliferation," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2355, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Li, Wanli & Li, Yue & Jacoby, Gady & Wu, Zhenyu, 2022. "Antidumping, firm performance, and subsequent responses," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

  7. James Devault, 1996. "Competitive Need Limits And The U.S. Generalized System Of Preference," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 14(4), pages 58-66, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Kara Reynolds, 2005. "The Erosion of Tariff Preferences: The Impact of U.S. Tariff Reductions on Developing Countries," International Trade 0507001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ingo Borchert & Mattia Di Ubaldo, 2024. "The Trade Impact of Surprise Graduations from the EU’s GSP scheme," Working Paper Series 1224, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Sharma, Anupa & Grant, Jason & Boys, Kathryn, 2015. "Truly Preferential Treatment? Reconsidering the Generalized System of (Trade) Preferences," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205890, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Layna Mosley & Robert Galantucci, 2019. "Protecting Workers Abroad and Industries at Home: Rights-based Conditionality in Trade Preference Programs," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(5), pages 1253-1282, May.
    5. Mary Amiti & John Romalis, 2007. "Will the Doha Round Lead to Preference Erosion?," NBER Working Papers 12971, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Tobias Sytsma, 2021. "Rules of origin and trade preference utilization among least developed countries," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 701-718, October.
    7. Seyoum, Belay, 2006. "US trade preferences and export performance of developing countries: Evidence from the generalized system of preferences," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 68-83, February.
    8. Shushanik Hakobyan, 2020. "GSP expiration and declining exports from developing countries," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 1132-1161, August.
    9. Shushanik Hakobyan, 2017. "Export Competitiveness of Developing Countries and US Trade Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1405-1429, July.
    10. Hakobyan, Shushanik, 2011. "Export Competitiveness of Developing Countries and U.S. Trade Policy," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011 37, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    11. Agama, Laurie-Ann & McDaniel, Christine A., 2002. "The NAFTA Preference and U.S.-Mexico Trade," Working Papers 15873, United States International Trade Commission, Office of Economics.

  8. James M. DeVault, 1996. "Political Pressure and the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 35-46, Winter.

    Cited by:

    1. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Layna Mosley & Robert Galantucci, 2019. "Protecting Workers Abroad and Industries at Home: Rights-based Conditionality in Trade Preference Programs," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(5), pages 1253-1282, May.
    2. Matschke, Xenia & Blanchard, Emily, 2013. "U.S. Multinationals and Preferential Market Access," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79751, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Ozden, Caglar & Reinhardt, Eric, 2003. "The perversity of preferences : GSP and developing country trade policies, 1976 - 2000," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2955, The World Bank.
    4. Miriam Manchin, 2006. "Preference Utilisation and Tariff Reduction in EU Imports from ACP Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(9), pages 1243-1266, September.
    5. Manchin, Miriam, 2005. "Preference utilization and tariff reduction in European Union imports from African, Caribbean, and Pacific countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3688, The World Bank.

  9. James Devault, 1990. "The Administration of US Antidumping Duties: Some Empirical Observations," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 75-88, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Nelson, Douglas, 2006. "The political economy of antidumping: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 554-590, September.
    2. James Nieberding, 1999. "The Effect of U.S. Antidumping Law on Firms' Market Power: An Empirical Test," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 14(1), pages 65-84, February.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, James Michael DeVault should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.