IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pde1307.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Samuel Demeulemeester

Personal Details

First Name:Samuel
Middle Name:
Last Name:Demeulemeester
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pde1307

Affiliation

Action, discours, pensée politique et économique (TRIANGLE)
École Normale Supérieure (ENS Lyon)

Lyon, France
http://triangle.ens-lyon.fr/
RePEc:edi:trilyfr (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2022. "What analytical framework for Sovereign Money? Some insight from the 100% Money literature, and a comment on criticisms," Working Papers hal-03751756, HAL.
  2. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: An avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," Post-Print hal-03103172, HAL.
  3. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2020. "Would a State Monopoly over Money Creation Allow for a Reduction of National Debt? A Study of the “Seigniorage Argument” in Light of the “100% Money” Debates," Post-Print hal-02495683, HAL.
  4. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2018. "The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach," Post-Print hal-01830363, HAL.

Articles

  1. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2022. "Dissocier la création monétaire des prêts bancaires : retour sur la proposition « 100 % monnaie » des années 1930," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 132(5), pages 835-859.
  2. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-598, July.
  3. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2018. "The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 357-387, March.

Chapters

  1. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2020. "Would a State Monopoly Over Money Creation Allow for a Reduction of National Debt? A Study of the “Seigniorage Argument” in Light of the “100% Money” Debates," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: Including a Symposium on Public Finance in the History of Economic Thought, volume 38, pages 123-144, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: An avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," Post-Print hal-03103172, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Eric Magnin & Nikolay Nenovsky, 2022. "Soft monetary constraint and shortage in the European sovereign debt economy," Post-Print hal-03665392, HAL.
    2. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2024. "The case for 100% money: Ten reasons for separating money issuance from banking," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 57-70, February.
    3. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2022. "What analytical framework for Sovereign Money? Some insight from the 100% Money literature, and a comment on criticisms," Working Papers hal-03751756, HAL.
    4. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2022. "Divorcing money creation from bank loans: revisiting the “100% money” proposal of the 1930s [Dissocier la création monétaire des prêts bancaires : retour sur la proposition "100% monnaie"," Post-Print hal-03938669, HAL.

  2. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2018. "The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach," Post-Print hal-01830363, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2024. "The case for 100% money: Ten reasons for separating money issuance from banking," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 57-70, February.
    2. Demeulemeester, Samuel, 2024. "Investigating the “Debt-Money-Prices” Triangle: Irving Fisher’s Theoretical Journey Toward the 100% Money Proposal," SocArXiv tfm6v, Center for Open Science.
    3. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2020. "Would a State Monopoly over Money Creation Allow for a Reduction of National Debt? A Study of the “Seigniorage Argument” in Light of the “100% Money” Debates," Post-Print hal-02495683, HAL.
    4. Sylvie Rivot, 2020. "Information and Expectations in Policy-Making: Friedman's Changing Approaches to Macroeconomic Dynamics," GREDEG Working Papers 2020-39, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    5. George S. Tavlas, 2024. "On the Controversy over the Origins of the Chicago Plan for 100% Reserves: Sorry, Frederick Soddy, it was Knight and (Most Probably) Simons!," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 56(6), pages 1573-1594, September.
    6. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-598, July.
    7. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2022. "What analytical framework for Sovereign Money? Some insight from the 100% Money literature, and a comment on criticisms," Working Papers hal-03751756, HAL.
    8. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2022. "Divorcing money creation from bank loans: revisiting the “100% money” proposal of the 1930s [Dissocier la création monétaire des prêts bancaires : retour sur la proposition "100% monnaie"," Post-Print hal-03938669, HAL.
    9. George S. Tavlas, 2020. "On the controversy over the origins of the Chicago Plan for 100 percent reserves," Working Papers 279, Bank of Greece.

Articles

  1. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2021. "The 100% money proposal of the 1930s: an avatar of the Currency School’s reform ideas?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 577-598, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Samuel Demeulemeester, 2018. "The 100% money proposal and its implications for banking: the Currie–Fisher approach versus the Chicago Plan approach," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 357-387, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

Chapters

    Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 4 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-MON: Monetary Economics (4) 2018-08-27 2020-05-11 2021-02-15 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  2. NEP-CBA: Central Banking (3) 2018-08-27 2020-05-11 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  3. NEP-PAY: Payment Systems and Financial Technology (3) 2020-05-11 2021-02-15 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  4. NEP-HIS: Business, Economic and Financial History (2) 2021-02-15 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  5. NEP-BAN: Banking (1) 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  6. NEP-GEN: Gender (1) 2020-05-11. Author is listed
  7. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  8. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (1) 2022-10-10. Author is listed

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Samuel Demeulemeester should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.