IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pda969.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Canh Thien Dang

Personal Details

First Name:Canh
Middle Name:Thien
Last Name:Dang
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pda969
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/canhthiendang/

Affiliation

Economics Department
London School of Economics (LSE)

London, United Kingdom
http://econ.lse.ac.uk/
RePEc:edi:edlseuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Dang, Canh Thien & Owens, Trudy, 2024. "Non-governmental organizations’ motivation to diversify:: self-interest or operation-related? Evidence from Uganda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120200, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  2. Dang, Canh Thien & Owens, Trudy, 2020. "Does transparency come at the cost of charitable services? Evidence from investigating British charities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103943, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  3. Ronelle Burger & Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2017. "Better performing NGOs do report more accurately: Evidence from investigating Ugandan NGO financial accounts," Discussion Papers 2017-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
  4. Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2017. "What motivates Ugandan NGOs to diversify: Risk reduction or private gain?," Discussion Papers 2017-11, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.

Articles

  1. Canh Thien Dang & Ronelle Burger & Trudy Owens, 2021. "Do Better-Performing Nongovernmental Organizations Report More Accurately? Evidence from Financial Accounts in Uganda," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(2), pages 789-828.
  2. Dang, Canh Thien & Owens, Trudy, 2020. "Does transparency come at the cost of charitable services? Evidence from investigating British charities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 314-343.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Dang, Canh Thien & Owens, Trudy, 2020. "Does transparency come at the cost of charitable services? Evidence from investigating British charities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103943, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Margaret Samahita & Leonhard K. Lades, 2021. "The Unintended Side Effects of Regulating Charities: Donors Penalise Administrative Burden Almost as Much as Overheads," Working Papers 202106, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    2. Baudier, Patricia & Kondrateva, Galina & Ammi, Chantal, 2023. "Can blockchain enhance motivation to donate: The moderating impact of religion on donors' behavior in the USA's charity organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. McDonald, Bruce D. III & Goodman, Christopher B, 2020. "The Truth about Honesty in the Nonprofit Sector," SocArXiv 48g5c, Center for Open Science.
    4. Gani Aldashev & Esteban Jaimovich & Thierry Verdier, 2023. "The Dark Side of Transparency: Mission Variety and Industry Equilibrium in Decentralised Public Good Provision," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(654), pages 2085-2109.
    5. Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2024. "Non-governmental organizations’ motivation to diversify: self-interest or operation-related? Evidence from Uganda," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(2), pages 561-584.
    6. Iman Parsa & Mahyar Eftekhar & Charles J Corbett, 2022. "Does governance ease the overhead squeeze experienced by nonprofits?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3288-3303, August.
    7. Dang, Canh Thien & Owens, Trudy, 2024. "Non-governmental organizations’ motivation to diversify:: self-interest or operation-related? Evidence from Uganda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120200, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

Articles

  1. Dang, Canh Thien & Owens, Trudy, 2020. "Does transparency come at the cost of charitable services? Evidence from investigating British charities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 314-343.
    See citations under working paper version above.Sorry, no citations of articles recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2024-03-25. Author is listed
  2. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-27. Author is listed

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Canh Thien Dang should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.