IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pze185.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Kathryn Zeiler

Personal Details

First Name:Kathryn
Middle Name:
Last Name:Zeiler
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pze185
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.bu.edu/kzeiler/

Affiliation

Boston University School of Law

https://www.bu.edu/law/
USA, Boston

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters Books

Working papers

  1. Chin, Jason & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2021. "Replicability in Empirical Legal Research," LawArXiv 2b5k4, Center for Open Science.
  2. Chin, Jason & DeHaven, Alexander Carl & Heycke, Tobias & Holcombe, Alex O. & Mellor, David Thomas & Pickett, Justin & Steltenpohl, Crystal Nicole & Vazire, Simine & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2020. "Improving the credibility of empirical legal research: practical suggestions for researchers, journals, and law schools," LawArXiv 952gh, Center for Open Science.
  3. Plott, Charles & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2005. "Asymmetries in exchange behavior incorrectly interpreted as evidence of prospect theory," Working Papers 1230, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
  4. Plott, Charles R. & Zeiler, Kathryn, 2002. "The Willingness to Pay/Willingness to Accept Gap, The "Endowment Effect" and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations," Working Papers 1132, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
  5. Kathryn Zeiler, "undated". "Medical Malpractice and Contract Disclosure: An Equilibrium Model of the Effects of Legal Rules on Behavior in Health Care Markets," American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings 1071, American Law & Economics Association.

Articles

  1. Kathryn Zeiler, 2019. "Mistaken about mistakes," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 9-27, August.
  2. Kathryn Zeiler, 2018. "Investigating the Politics of Legal Empirics: Possible Next Steps," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 174(1), pages 238-243, March.
  3. Charles R. Plott & Kathryn Zeiler, 2011. "The Willingness to Pay--Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: Reply," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(2), pages 1012-1028, April.
  4. Kathryn Zeiler, 2010. "Cautions on the Use of Economics Experiments in Law," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 166(1), pages 178-193, March.
  5. Charles Silver & Kathryn Zeiler & Bernard S Black & David A Hyman & William M Sage, 2008. "Malpractice Payouts and Malpractice Insurance: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990–2003*," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 33(2), pages 177-192, April.
  6. Charles R. Plott & Kathryn Zeiler, 2007. "Exchange Asymmetries Incorrectly Interpreted as Evidence of Endowment Effect Theory and Prospect Theory?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1449-1466, September.
  7. Kathryn Zeiler & Charles Silver & Bernard Black & David A. Hyman & William M. Sage, 2007. "Physicians' Insurance Limits and Malpractice Payments: Evidence from Texas Closed Claims, 1990-2003," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(S2), pages 9-45, June.
  8. David A. Hyman & Bernard Black & Kathryn Zeiler & Charles Silver & William M. Sage, 2007. "Do Defendants Pay What Juries Award? Post‐Verdict Haircuts in Texas Medical Malpractice Cases, 1988–2003," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 3-68, March.
  9. Charles R. Plott & Kathryn Zeiler, 2005. "The Willingness to Pay–Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect," Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(3), pages 530-545, June.

Chapters

  1. Kathryn Zeiler, 2018. "What explains observed reluctance to trade? A comprehensive literature review," Chapters, in: Joshua C. Teitelbaum & Kathryn Zeiler (ed.), Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics, chapter 13, pages 347-430, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  2. Kathryn Zeiler & Lorian Hardcastle, 2013. "Do damages caps reduce medical malpractice insurance premiums? A systematic review of estimates and the methods used to produce them," Chapters, in: Jennifer H. Arlen (ed.), Research Handbook on the Economics of Torts, chapter 21, pages 551-587, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Books

  1. Joshua C. Teitelbaum & Kathryn Zeiler (ed.), 2018. "Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14176.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-LAW: Law and Economics (1) 2021-01-11
  2. NEP-PPM: Project, Program and Portfolio Management (1) 2020-09-28
  3. NEP-SOG: Sociology of Economics (1) 2021-01-11

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Kathryn Zeiler should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.