IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pmy41.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Kyle Roy Myers

Personal Details

First Name:Kyle
Middle Name:Roy
Last Name:Myers
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pmy41
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://hcmg.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/21733

Affiliation

Wharton School of Business
University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (United States)
http://www.wharton.upenn.edu/
RePEc:edi:wsupaus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Matthew Grennan & Kyle Myers & Ashley Swanson & Aaron Chatterji, 2018. "No Free Lunch? Welfare Analysis of Firms Selling Through Expert Intermediaries," NBER Working Papers 24864, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  2. Mark Pauly & Kyle Myers, 2016. "A Ricardian-Demand Explanation for Changing Pharmaceutical R&D Productivity," NBER Working Papers 22720, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Articles

  1. Kyle Myers, 2020. "The Elasticity of Science," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 103-134, October.
  2. Kyle Myers & Mark Pauly, 2019. "Endogenous productivity of demand‐induced R&D: evidence from pharmaceuticals," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 591-614, September.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Kyle Myers, 2020. "The Elasticity of Science," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 103-134, October.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Chris Sampson’s journal round-up for 19th October 2020
      by Chris Sampson in The Academic Health Economists' Blog on 2020-10-19 11:00:05

Working papers

  1. Matthew Grennan & Kyle Myers & Ashley Swanson & Aaron Chatterji, 2018. "No Free Lunch? Welfare Analysis of Firms Selling Through Expert Intermediaries," NBER Working Papers 24864, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Carey, Colleen & Lieber, Ethan M.J. & Miller, Sarah, 2021. "Drug firms’ payments and physicians’ prescribing behavior in Medicare Part D," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Sofia Amaral-Garcia, 2020. "Medical Device Companies and Doctors: Do their Interactions Affect Medical Treatments ?," Working Papers ECARES 2020-18, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Leila Agha & Dan Zeltzer, 2019. "Drug Diffusion Through Peer Networks: The Influence of Industry Payments," NBER Working Papers 26338, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Svetlana Beilfuss & Sebastian Linde, 2021. "Pharmaceutical opioid marketing and physician prescribing behavior," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3159-3185, December.

Articles

  1. Kyle Myers, 2020. "The Elasticity of Science," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 103-134, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Kyle R. Myers, 2022. "Some Tradeoffs of Competition in Grant Contests," Papers 2207.02379, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    2. de Bettignies, Jean-Etienne & Ries, John, 2023. "When less is more: Information and the financing of innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 346-369.
    3. Ruchir Agarwal & Patrick Gaulé, 2021. "What Drives Innovation? Lessons from COVID-19 R&D," IMF Working Papers 2021/048, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Christoph Carnehl & Marco Ottaviani & Justus Preusser, 2024. "Designing Scientific Grants," NBER Working Papers 32668, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Galasso, Alberto & Luo, Hong & Zhu, Brooklynn, 2023. "Laboratory safety and research productivity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    6. Kyle R. Myers & Lauren Lanahan, 2022. "Estimating Spillovers from Publicly Funded R&D: Evidence from the US Department of Energy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(7), pages 2393-2423, July.
    7. Confraria, Hugo & Ciarli, Tommaso & Noyons, E., 2022. "Countries' research priorities in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals," MERIT Working Papers 2022-030, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Joshua Krieger & Ramana Nanda & Ian Hunt & Aimee Reynolds & Peter Tarsa, 2022. "Scoring and Funding Breakthrough Ideas: Evidence from a Global Pharmaceutical Company," Harvard Business School Working Papers 23-014, Harvard Business School, revised Nov 2023.
    9. Maya M. Durvasula & Sabri Eyuboglu & David M. Ritzwoller, 2024. "Distilling Data from Large Language Models: An Application to Research Productivity Measurement," Papers 2405.08030, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    10. Howell, Sabrina T. & Rathje, Jason & Van Reenen, John & Wong, Jun, 2021. "Opening up military innovation: causal effects of reforms to US defense research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114430, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Gaetan de Rassenfosse & Kyle Higham & Orion Penner, 2022. "Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent," Working Papers 19, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
    12. Blandinieres, Florence & Pellens, Maikel, 2021. "Scientist's industry engagement and the research agenda: Evidence from Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-001, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Fry, Caroline V. & Lynham, John & Tran, Shannon, 2023. "Ranking researchers: Evidence from Indonesia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(5).
    14. Yi Zhang & Xiaojing Cai & Caroline V. Fry & Mengjia Wu & Caroline S. Wagner, 2021. "Topic evolution, disruption and resilience in early COVID-19 research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4225-4253, May.
    15. Mancuso, Raffaele & Rossi-Lamastra, Cristina & Franzoni, Chiara, 2023. "Topic choice, gendered language, and the under-funding of female scholars in mission-oriented research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    16. Aslan, Yasemin & Yaqub, Ohid & Rotolo, Daniele & Sampat, Bhaven N., 2023. "Cross-category spillovers in medical research," SocArXiv hpmxd, Center for Open Science.
    17. Yeon Hak Kim & Aaron D. Levine & Eric J. Nehl & John P. Walsh, 2020. "A bibliometric measure of translational science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2349-2382, December.
    18. Tania Babina & Alex Xi He & Sabrina T. Howell & Elisabeth Ruth Perlman & Joseph Staudt, 2021. "The Color of Money: Federal vs. Industry Funding of University Research," Working Papers 21-26, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    19. Escolar, Emerson G. & Hiraoka, Yasuaki & Igami, Mitsuru & Ozcan, Yasin, 2023. "Mapping firms’ locations in technological space: A topological analysis of patent statistics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    20. Kyle Myers & Wei Yang Tham, 2023. "Money, Time, and Grant Design," Papers 2312.06479, arXiv.org.
    21. Rebecca McKibbin & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2021. "Does Research Save Lives? The Local Spillovers of Biomedical Research on Mortality," NBER Working Papers 29420, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  2. Kyle Myers & Mark Pauly, 2019. "Endogenous productivity of demand‐induced R&D: evidence from pharmaceuticals," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 50(3), pages 591-614, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Lafond, François & Goldin, Ian & Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Winkler, Julian, 2022. "Why is productivity slowing down?," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-08, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    2. Maya M. Durvasula & Sabri Eyuboglu & David M. Ritzwoller, 2024. "Distilling Data from Large Language Models: An Application to Research Productivity Measurement," Papers 2405.08030, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (2) 2016-10-23 2018-08-27. Author is listed
  2. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2018-08-27. Author is listed
  3. NEP-EFF: Efficiency and Productivity (1) 2016-10-23. Author is listed
  4. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (1) 2018-08-27. Author is listed
  5. NEP-HIS: Business, Economic and Financial History (1) 2016-10-23. Author is listed
  6. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (1) 2016-10-23. Author is listed
  7. NEP-INO: Innovation (1) 2016-10-23. Author is listed

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Kyle Roy Myers should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.