IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/hbsedi/289432.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Strategische Finanzberichterstattung durch Pro forma-Kennzahlen und Finanzgrafiken: Herausforderung für die Abschlussanalyse

Author

Listed:
  • Sellhorn, Thorsten
  • Hombach, Katharina
  • Stier, Christian

Abstract

Wer von Bilanzpolitik spricht, der versteht darunter in der Regel die Ausnutzung von Bilanzierungs-, Bewertungs- und Ausweiswahlrechten durch das Unternehmen mit dem Ziel, dessen wirtschaftliche Lage interessenpolitisch zu gestalten. Typischerweise wird das Unternehmen dabei versuchen, eine besonders "gute" Vermögens-, Finanz- und Ertragslage zu zeigen oder sich "arm zu rechnen", seine wahren Schätze also zu verbergen. Weniger bekannt - bzw. nicht zuvorderst als Mittel der Bilanzpolitik verstanden - sind zwei weitere Möglichkeiten, das Urteil des Bilanzlesers über ein Unternehmen zu beeinflussen: Die Verwendung von Grafiken zur Veranschaulichung finanzieller Informationen und der Ausweis so genannter Pro Forma-Kennzahlen, d. h. aus dem Rechnungswesen abgeleiteter Ergebniskennzahlen. Obwohl - oder gerade weil? - Unternehmen beide Instrumente in ihren Geschäftsberichten und Jahresabschlüssen mittlerweile aber ganz selbstverständlich nutzen, sind ggf. dem einen oder anderen Bilanzleser die damit verbundenen Manipulationsmöglichkeiten nicht bewusst. Vor diesem Hintergrund verfolgt diese Handlungshilfe zwei Ziele: Den Bilanzleser für solche Beeinflussungen zu sensibilisieren und ihn außerdem auf Augenhöhe mit dem Unternehmen zu bringen, was die Spielarten und Einsatzfelder von Finanzgrafiken und Pro Forma-Kennzahlen angeht. Letztlich soll er damit befähigt werden, eventuelle Manipulationsversuche aufzudecken, rückgängig zu machen und so ein unverfälschtes Bild von der wirtschaftlichen Lage zu gewinnen.

Suggested Citation

  • Sellhorn, Thorsten & Hombach, Katharina & Stier, Christian, 2014. "Strategische Finanzberichterstattung durch Pro forma-Kennzahlen und Finanzgrafiken: Herausforderung für die Abschlussanalyse," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 289432, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:289432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/289432/1/edition-hbs-286.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beattie, Vivien & Jones, Michael John, 2001. "A six-country comparison of the use of graphs in annual reports," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-222, May.
    2. Paul Mather & Alan Ramsay & Adam Steen, 2000. "The use and representational faithfulness of graphs in Australian IPO prospectuses," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 65-83, March.
    3. Flora Muiño & Marco Trombetta, 2009. "Does graph disclosure bias reduce the cost of equity capital?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 83-102.
    4. Vivien Beattie & Michael John Jones, 2002. "The Impact of Graph Slope on Rate of Change Judgments in Corporate Reports," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 38(2), pages 177-199, June.
    5. Vivien Beattie & Michael John Jones, 2002. "Measurement distortion of graphs in corporate reports: an experimental study," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(4), pages 546-564, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Michael John, 2011. "The nature, use and impression management of graphs in social and environmental accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 75-89.
    2. Shaio Yan Huang & Tung-Hsien Wu & An-An Chiu & David C. Yen, 2015. "Measurements of mislead threshold of company graph distortion," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1111-1132, October.
    3. Simone Aresu, 2015. "Graphical Reporting in Italian Annual Reports during the Financial Crisis: Impression Management or Incremental Information?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 77-106.
    4. Parsons, Linda M. & Tinkelman, Daniel, 2013. "Testing the feasibility of small multiples of sparklines to display semimonthly income statement data," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 58-76.
    5. Monir Zaman Mir & Bikram Chatterjee & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2009. "Culture and corporate voluntary reporting: A comparative exploration of the chairperson's report in India and New Zealand," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(7), pages 639-667, July.
    6. Flora Mui¤o V zquez & ?Marco Trombetta, 2007. "Does graph disclosure bias reduce the cost of equity capital?," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0039, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    7. Walter P. Mkumbuzi, 2016. "Influence of Intellectual Capital Investment, Risk, Industry Membership and Corporate Governance Mechanisms on the Voluntary Disclosure of Intellectual Capital by UK Listed Companies," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 42-74, January.
    8. Rosdini, Dini & Sari, Prima Yusi & Amrania, Gia Kardina Prima & Yulianingsih, Pera, 2020. "Decision making biased: How visual illusion, mood, and information presentation plays a role," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    9. Hearn, Bruce, 2013. "The institutional determinants of IPO firm prospectus length in a developing context: A research note," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 52-65.
    10. David Campbell & Ken McPhail & Richard Slack, 2009. "Face work in annual reports," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(6), pages 907-932, July.
    11. Beattie, Vivien, 2005. "Moving the financial accounting research front forward: the UK contribution," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 85-114.
    12. Elodie Behnam, 2013. "La Lisibilite De La Communication Financiere En France : Le Cas De La Lettre Aux Actionnaires," Post-Print hal-01002368, HAL.
    13. Hooks, Jill & van Staden, Chris J., 2011. "Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 200-213.
    14. García Osma, Beatriz & Guillamón-Saorín, Encarna, 2011. "Corporate governance and impression management in annual results press releases," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 187-208.
    15. Schreder, Max, 2018. "Idiosyncratic information and the cost of equity capital: A meta-analytic review of the literature," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 142-172.
    16. Battaglia, Francesca & Gallo, Angela, 2013. "Securitization and systemic risk: An empirical investigation on Italian banks over the financial crisis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 274-286.
    17. Francesco Mazzi & Paul André & Dionysia Dionysiou & Ioannis Tsalavoutas, 2017. "Compliance with goodwill-related mandatory disclosure requirements and the cost of equity capital," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(3), pages 268-312, April.
    18. Tuvana Cüre & Emel Esen & Arzu Özsözgün Çalışkan, 2020. "Impression Management in Graphical Representation of Economic, Social, and Environmental Issues: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Frii, Peter & O’nions, Elizabeth & Sofla, Amin & Stålnacke, Oscar, 2023. "CEO gender and the probability that firms go public," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    20. Flora Muiño & Marco Trombetta, 2009. "Does graph disclosure bias reduce the cost of equity capital?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 83-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hbsedi:289432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/boeckde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.