IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/58789.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Defining Research Gaps Concerning the Implementation of Socio-ecological Transition. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 115

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Weiss

    (WIFO)

Abstract

This paper summarises future research questions for each driver of change based on the outcomes of the WWWforEurope project and the derived policy recommendations. Firstly, a broad research question is suggested for each driver indicating the main focus of interest. In a second step, several analytical aspects as well as policy aspects are defined to specify the broad research questions. While focusing on the seven drivers of change when formulating the research questions, attention was also paid to so-called cross-cutting issues (e.g., gender aspects, strategies for implementing the Paris climate agreements). The research gaps are based on the fundamental insight of WWWforEurope that highlights the importance of applying a comprehensive and integrated approach for achieving the three strategic project goals instead of following a silo approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Weiss, 2016. "Defining Research Gaps Concerning the Implementation of Socio-ecological Transition. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 115," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58789, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/58789
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl Aiginger, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition – Part I: Synthesis. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 11," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58791, April.
    2. Harald Badinger & David Bailey & Lisa de Propris & Peter Huber & Jürgen Janger & Kurt Kratena & Hans Pitlik & Thomas Sauer & Renaud Thillaye & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition – Part II: Model and Area Chapters. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 12," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58792.
    3. Karl Aiginger, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition. WWWforEurope Synthesis Report, Part I – Executive Summary," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58737, April.
    4. Marina Fischer-Kowalski & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2014. "An Optimal Policy Mix for Resource Use. WWWforEurope Policy Brief No. 5," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 47505.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karl Aiginger, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition – Part I: Synthesis. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 11," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58791, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana Mazzucato & Rainer Kattel & Josh Ryan-Collins, 2020. "Challenge-Driven Innovation Policy: Towards a New Policy Toolkit," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 421-437, June.
    2. Karl Aiginger (Correspondence author) & Heinz Handler, 2018. "Fostering a Dynamic and Stable Neighborhood for Europe," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 14, pages 39-54, November.
    3. Karl Aiginger, 2016. "New Dynamics for Europe: Reaping the Benefits of Socio-ecological Transition – Part I: Synthesis. WWWforEurope Deliverable No. 11," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58791, April.
    4. Sandro Montresor & Francesco Quatraro, 2020. "Green technologies and Smart Specialisation Strategies: a European patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling technologies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 1354-1365, October.
    5. Marina Apgar & Mieke Snijder & Grace Lyn Higdon & Sylvia Szabo, 2023. "Evaluating Research for Development: Innovation to Navigate Complexity," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 241-259, April.
    6. Gibbs, David & O'Neill, Kirstie, 2017. "Future green economies and regional development: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68392, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:58789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.