Author
Listed:
- M. Agung Hastowo
- Tonny Indarto
Abstract
The central bank’s objective is to achieve monetary stability. In achieving its objectives, central banks conduct monetary transactions with different objectives than commercial entities. The central bank may hold a large number of financial instruments, both in domestic currency and foreign currencies. While the financial instruments possessed by the central bank may have similar features as those owned by commercial entities, they are intended for policy implementation instead of for profit creation.The financial statements of the central bank should be interpreted as a whole in relation to the achievement of central bank objectives. Thus, central bank financial statements are not meant for decision-making on investments by stakeholders. The difference in financial reporting purposes may raise the question as to whether the accounting standards for commercial entities, such as IFRS, is suitable for central banks. This paper shows in general, the choice of central bank financial reporting framework is defined by the function, ownership or accountability of central bank. The central bank is a unique not-for-profit entity; therefore, profits are not a measure of central bank performance. As a tool of accountability, financial statements of a central bank should be reliable and understandable. Despite limitations of the IFRS, many central banks have opted to use the IFRS because of the absence of central bank-specialized accounting standards. Some institutions have employed either national accounting standards, central bank-specific standards, or some combination thereof. This study was conducted to shed light on central bank accounting practices and focuses on SEACEN central banks and their roles, financial reporting practices and the users' perspective on the central bank financial statements. In terms of financial reporting, consistent with previous research, the study found that there are variations in financial reporting framework used by central banks in the SEACEN economies. 42% of central banks have establish their own accounting standards while the other 42% adopt the IFRS fully. In between, 16 % adopt the IFRS or national IFRS with modifications. The study suggests that there is a different emphasis on the importance of each component of financial statements. It is noted that several central banks, even one which applies the IFRS, opt not to present the statement of cash flows. In the case of a central bank using an accounting framework that significantly departs from the IFRS or modified-IFRS standard, there are some main key departures, which includes the effect of changes of foreign exchanges, subsequent measurement of financial assets, and measurement of FX Swap for monetary operations. The study also found that there are different views of users whether the bottom line of the central bank's financial statements is important. Nevertheless, they agree that accounting standards should be applied able to support the stability of income.
Suggested Citation
M. Agung Hastowo & Tonny Indarto, 2016.
"Fundamental Principles of Central Bank Financial Reporting: A Preliminary Study in SEACEN Economies,"
Research Studies,
South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre, number rp98, April.
Handle:
RePEc:sea:rstudy:rp98
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sea:rstudy:rp98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Azharin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seacemy.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.