IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ris/prodcs/19.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Review of the Australian Consumer Product Safety System

Author

Listed:
  • Productivity Commission

Abstract

The Productivity Commission’s research report into the 'Review of the Australian Consumer Product Safety System', was released on 7 February 2006. The Commission was requested to undertake a research study to examine the impacts of options for reforming Australia’s general consumer product safety system. The Commission’s final report recommends a new national approach is needed to improve Australia’s consumer product safety system. The adoption of a single national law and regulator, replacing the States and Territories authority, is recommended by the Commission as a key reform to create a more consistent and responsive consumer product protection system. The Commission has also called for the responsiveness of the system to be improved by: introducing a new requirement for suppliers to notify the regulator of products associated with serious injury or death; developing a nationally coordinated product hazard identification system; and improving the targeting and timeliness of standards-making processes. To address information gaps, the Commission has endorsed a number of initiatives including: a national internet based one-stop shop for business and consumer information; and a one-off base line research study into the incidence and costs of product-related accidents, and an analysis of their causes.

Suggested Citation

  • Productivity Commission, 2006. "Review of the Australian Consumer Product Safety System," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 19.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:19
    Note: 503 pages
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/9998/productsafety.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/productsafety/docs/finalreport
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirsten Vallmuur & Caroline Lukaszyk & Jesani Catchpoole, 2018. "Monitoring Injuries Associated with Mandated Children’s Products in Australia: What Can the Data Tell Us?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, September.
    2. L. Nottage, 2020. "Improving the Effectiveness of the Consumer Product Safety System: Australian Law Reform in Asia-Pacific Context," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 829-850, December.
    3. Jesani Catchpoole & Sue Walker & Kirsten Vallmuur, 2016. "The Extent of Consumer Product Involvement in Paediatric Injuries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-9, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MAPS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.