IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ris/prodcs/0048.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Early Childhood Development Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Commission, Productivity

    (Productivity Commission)

Abstract

The Productivity Commission’s report - Early Childhood Development Workforce – released 1 December 2011, finds that many more workers will be required in preschool and long day care. Full implementation of the reforms will require an estimated 15,000 more workers than would otherwise have been the case. On average, the level of workers' qualifications will also need to increase. The wages of workers in those early childhood education and care roles that require relatively high level vocational education and training or university qualifications would be expected to rise as a result. The Commission considered that Government timelines for reform appear optimistic, with implementation due to start in January 2012. The supply of the most highly qualified workers, particularly teachers, is likely to take some time to respond. The report notes that to sustain the benefits of higher levels of qualification, access to ongoing professional development and support for staff will be very important - including in relation to training in the expanding integrated early childhood development centres. The report indicates that early childhood development services for children with additional needs, and for Indigenous children, are not meeting the standards commonly available to other children. It is essential that early childhood development workforce requirements for children with additional needs and Indigenous children are given priority, so that the gap between these groups and other children is minimised, not exacerbated. In addition, alternative child care subsidy structures, emphasising targeting to the most disadvantaged children and families, could help ensure access to services for those who would benefit most. The report is the second in a series of three Commission studies covering the workforces of Vocational Education and Training, Early Childhood Development and Schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Commission, Productivity, 2011. "Early Childhood Development Workforce," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 48.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:0048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/education-workforce/early-childhood/report
    File Function: Website publication
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Warren & John P. Haisken-DeNew, 2013. "Early Bird Catches the Worm: The Causal Impact of Pre-school Participation and Teacher Qualifications on Year 3 National NAPLAN Cognitive Tests," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n34, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    2. Kinchin, Irina & Doran, Christopher M. & McCalman, Janya & Jacups, Susan & Tsey, Komla & Lines, Katrina & Smith, Kieran & Searles, Andrew, 2017. "Delivering an empowerment intervention to a remote Indigenous child safety workforce: Its economic cost from an agency perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 85-89.
    3. Kelly Hardy & Leesa Hooker & Lael Ridgway & Kristina Edvardsson, 2019. "Australian parents' experiences when discussing their child's overweight and obesity with the Maternal and Child Health nurse: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3610-3617, October.
    4. Annie Delaney & Yee-Fui Ng & Vidhula Venugopal, 2018. "Comparing Australian garment and childcare homeworkers’ experience of regulation and representation," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 346-364, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    early childhood development; ECD workforce; early childhood education; vocational education and training; childcare; long day care; additional needs; disadvantage children;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:0048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MAPS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.