IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ris/prodcs/0046.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Commission, Productivity

    (Productivity Commission)

Abstract

This Productivity Commission research report, released on 16 May 2011, has identified wide-ranging differences in the ways all levels of government plan and zone land uses and assess development proposals. In Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments – a report commissioned by COAG – the Commission compared the regulatory frameworks, land supply processes, developer contributions, assessment and referral processes, and the impacts of planning and zoning on competition in retail markets of the jurisdictions. Governance, community engagement and transparency and accountability were also explored. The planning task is also suffering from ‘objectives overload’, according to the Commission. A growing number of issues and policy agendas impact on land-use considerations, including population pressures, climate change and risks posed by fires and floods. The many cases where the costs of a land use are borne by people in localised areas, while the benefits are shared across a whole city or region — such as major residential developments or waste disposal sites — pose a core challenge. The report identifies numerous ‘leading practices’ which can contribute to smoother processes and improved outcomes, such as: ensuring that local plans are more quickly brought up to date with the strategic city plans; completing structure planning of greenfield areas before development commences; ensuring alternative development and rezoning assessment mechanisms are transparent and independent and have clear criteria for triggering them; engaging the community and business as partners and clients in planning. Although each jurisdiction is home to at least one leading practice, the report concludes that there are opportunities for all jurisdictions to improve the way they operate in this important area, in order to reduce burdens on business and costs to the community, as well as to increase competition and improve the liveability of cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Commission, Productivity, 2011. "Performance Benchmarking of Australian Business Regulation: Planning, Zoning and Development Assessments," Research Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, volume 2, number 46.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/study/regulationbenchmarking/planning/report
    File Function: Publication website
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gilbert, Catherine & Gurran, Nicole, 2021. "Can ceding planning controls for major projects support metropolitan housing supply and diversity? The case of Sydney, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Wing Hsieh & David Norman & David Orsmond, 2012. "Supply-side Issues in the Housing Sector," RBA Bulletin (Print copy discontinued), Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 11-20, September.
    3. Ross Kendall & Peter Tulip, 2018. "The Effect of Zoning on Housing Prices," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2018-03, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    4. Andrew Macintosh & Anita Foerster & Jan McDonald, 2015. "Policy design, spatial planning and climate change adaptation: a case study from Australia," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(8), pages 1432-1453, August.
    5. Mariano Kulish & Anthony Richards & Christian Gillitzer, 2012. "Urban Structure and Housing Prices: Some Evidence from Australian Cities," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(282), pages 303-322, September.
    6. Peter Newton & Denny Meyer & Stephen Glackin, 2017. "Becoming Urban: Exploring the Transformative Capacity for a Suburban-to-Urban Transition in Australia’s Low-Density Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Keaton Jenner & Peter Tulip, 2020. "The Apartment Shortage," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2020-04, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    8. Elizabeth Taylor, 2014. ""Fight the towers! Or kiss your car park goodbye": How often do residents assert car parking rights in Melbourne planning appeals?," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 328-348, September.
    9. Judith Yates, 2011. "Housing in Australia in the 2000s: On the Agenda Too Late?," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: Hugo Gerard & Jonathan Kearns (ed.),The Australian Economy in the 2000s, Reserve Bank of Australia.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    planning; zoning; development; planning and zoning systems; land development; gaming; COAG; regulatory reform agenda;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A10 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - General
    • B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General
    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodcs:0046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MAPS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.