IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/mgt/fmkmon/978-961-266-182-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Socrates and Leonardo da Vinci in Slovenia

Author

Listed:
  • Klemen Sirok
  • Valerij Dermol
  • Alenka Juric Rajh
  • Duša Marjetic
  • Nada Trunk Sirca

Abstract

This study presents the impact assessment evaluation of European education and training programmes Socrates II and Leonardo da Vinci II, in Slovenia. The evaluation carried out in 2007 aims to determine the programme objective areas with greatest impact and the areas where objectives were falling behind. Generally, the impacts of actions for all objectives are at least small. With this regard, evaluation confirmed that certain degree of success is noticeable in all evaluated actions and both European education and training programmes. The impact of actions and programmes, however, differs from objective to objective. According to the findings, the evaluated actions have two stronger lines of impact. The first, perhaps the strongest pronounced one, manifests itself in the impact on raising the level of competency of individuals. The first one mostly regards improving the knowledge of foreign languages, skills and competences of participants in the field of vocational education. A strong impact is noticeable in terms of vocational development of participants as well. The second line, somewhat less pronounced, is noticeable in the area of cooperation, mostly in the aspect of increasing the extent of international cooperation between educational organisations and other enterprises. The participants of evaluated actions and programmes consider the actions they participated in to have a positive impact on raising formal education and as a result on raising social and, to a lesser extent, economic status of participants. This finding puts the impacts of programmes and actions within them into a very positive context since it negates the stereotype that individual mobilities are 'first intended for tourism and only then for obtaining knowledge, skills and information'. Participation in European education and training programmes, mostly in Erasmus action, according to the assessments of groups of younger participants who place themselves in the lowest social class, also represents an important mechanism of vertical social mobility. The study also investigated various differences among programme actions and various sub-groups of final beneficiaries. Upon the evaluation conclusions, recommendations for possible improvements in implementation of the evaluated actions in Slovenia are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Klemen Sirok & Valerij Dermol & Alenka Juric Rajh & Duša Marjetic & Nada Trunk Sirca, 2015. "Socrates and Leonardo da Vinci in Slovenia," Faculty of Management Koper Monograph Series, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, number 978-961-266-182-3, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgt:fmkmon:978-961-266-182-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-182-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-183-0/flipbook.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willem Saris & Irmtraud Gallhofer, 2004. "Operationalization of Social Science Concepts by Intuition," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 235-258, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ginevra Floridi & Benjamin E. Lauderdale, 2022. "Pairwise comparisons as a scale development tool for composite measures," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(2), pages 519-542, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:fmkmon:978-961-266-182-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.