Author
Abstract
This PIIE Briefing assesses the effectiveness of the US government's program of federal subsidies to foster domestic production of advanced semiconductors. It focuses on the results so far of Division A of the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, with a subsidy budget (including collateral investment tax credits) approaching $200 billion. The authors evaluate the program across several goals: expanding US production, enhancing economic and national security, reducing US reliance on imported chips, producing 20 percent of global leading-edge chips by 2030, and creating jobs. They also explore questions not specifically identified as CHIPS Act goals: Is semiconductor technology accelerated by subsidies? Is capital expenditure accelerated? Will future US subsidies be needed to achieve the 20 percent goal? And would tariff protection be a better policy than subsidies? The semiconductor industry has been generously subsidized since its inception, not only by the United States but also by major competitors (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, China, and Europe). The authors conclude that the CHIPS Act burst of US subsidies will sharply increase production of advanced chips on US territory. This will enhance national security to the extent that it boosts the domestic supply of chips, reducing the risk of future shortages. But more US production might not provide the best security for the money, and it may reduce but not eliminate US reliance on imported semiconductors.
Suggested Citation
Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Megan Hogan, .
"Industrial policy through the CHIPS and Science Act: A preliminary report,"
PIIE Briefings,
Peterson Institute for International Economics, number PIIEB25-1, Ene-Abr.
Handle:
RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb25-1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb25-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.