IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ecr/col016/2937.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Millennium development goals: advances in environmentally sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean

Editor

Listed:
  • ECLAC

Author

Listed:
  • -

Abstract

By adopting the Millennium Declaration of 2000, the 189 States Members of the United Nations undertook a commitment to redouble their efforts to eradicate poverty in the world. This led to the establishment of the Millennium Development Goals, with targets to be achieved by 2015, taking 1990 as a base year. Environmental sustainability is included among the Goals owing to its great relevance to poverty reduction efforts, health, gender equality and the other components of development. The targets associated with the seventh Millennium Development Goal —to ensure environmental sustainability— aim to ensure the integration of the principles of sustainable development into public policies, reduce the loss of biodiversity and natural resources, cut atmospheric pollution, broaden access to safe drinking water and sanitation and decrease the number of slum-dwellers. The agencies of the United Nations assumed a commitment to support and monitor progress towards the achievement of the Goals derived from the Millennium Declaration. In Latin America and the Caribbean, the agencies fulfilled this commitment by coordinating their efforts to report in 2005 on all eight Goals; to give an account in 2006 of the progress towards attainment of the third Goal on gender equality; and to examine in 2008 advances towards the right to health, which encompasses Goals 4, 5 and 6. Ten years after the Millennium Declaration, this report sets forth the progress the Latin American and Caribbean region has made, as well as the challenges it still needs to overcome, in order to meet the targets of the seventh Goal and attempts to offer instruments by which to steer policies and actions to ensure the environmental sustainability of development in the region. As discussed in the report, significant progress has been made in some aspects of environmental sustainability: the total surface area under protection has increased steadily in the last decade, the consumption of ozone-depleting substances has decreased considerably, and the region has made strides in expanding the coverage of drinking water and sanitation services. These are all poitive developments towards achieving the targets of the seventh Millennium Development Goal. Many hurdles remain, however, such as the continued depletion of forest areas and the steady increase in CO2 emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels and the production of cement. In both cases, the region has been tending to diverge from the targets. There is also a lack of specific data on issues that are crucial for the region, such as the management of water resources, fishing and endangered species. Indirect and complementary information suggests that the region is not on track to meet the agreed targets in these cases either. For all these reasons, now, only five years from the deadline for attaining the Millennium Development Goals, it is essential to step up our efforts. In this, the support of the international community will be essential. Today multiple obstacles —including the financial, climate, energy and food crises— threaten to divert the region away from fulfilment of its promises in the area of environmental sustainability. Although these crises are imposing new challenges on the Latin American and Caribbean countries, they also represent opportunities to instil changes that can propel the region towards a more equitable and sustainable type of development. This document was prepared by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) in close collaboration with the regional offices of the other agencies in the United Nations system, particularly the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Population Fund (UNPFA), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS). We trust that this report will be of use to policymakers and all those committed to achieving environmental sustainability in the process of regional development. Alicia BárcenaExecutive Secretary Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)

Suggested Citation

  • -, 2010. "Millennium development goals: advances in environmentally sustainable development in Latin America and the Caribbean," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2937 edited by Eclac.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col016:2937
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/2937
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Sohngen, Brent & Mendelsohn, Robert & Sedjo, Roger A., 2001. "A Global Model Of Climate Change Impacts On Timber Markets," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Cecchini, Simone & Rodríguez Vignoli, Jorge & Simioni, Daniela, 2006. "La medición de los objetivos de desarrollo del milenio en las áreas urbanas de América Latina," Estudios Estadísticos 4742, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    4. -, 2009. "La actual crisis financiera internacional y sus efectos en América Latina y el Caribe," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2924 edited by Cepal.
    5. Estache, Antonio & Guasch, Jose-Luis & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2003. "Price caps, efficiency payoffs, and infrastructure contract renegotiation in Latin America," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3129, The World Bank.
    6. -, 2008. "Promoting corporate social responsibility in small and medium enterprises in the Caribbean: survey results," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Office in Washington 5067, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    7. Roffe, Pedro & Santa Cruz, Maximiliano, 2006. "Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en los acuerdos de libre comercio celebrados por países de América Latina con países desarrollados," Comercio Internacional 4416, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    8. George R.G. Clarke & Katrina Kosec & Scott Wallsten, 2009. "Has private participation in water and sewerage improved coverage? Empirical evidence from Latin America," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 327-361.
    9. -, 2009. "The reactions of the governments of Latin America and the Caribbean to the international crisis: an overview of policy measures up to 31 May 2009," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2918 edited by Eclac.
    10. -, 2007. "Overview of the water profile and the capacity of national institutions to implement integrated water resources management (Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada)," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 27629, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    11. -, 2007. "Millennium development goals. 2006 report: a look at gender equality and empowerment of women in Latin America and the Caribbean," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2893 edited by Eclac.
    12. -, 2005. "The millennium development goals: a Latin American and Caribbean perspective," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2798 edited by Eclac.
    13. Alonso, Victoria, 2006. "Avances en la discusión sobre la ISO 26000 en América Latina: antecedentes para apoyar el proceso ISO en la región," Documentos de Proyectos 3999, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. -, 2012. "Sustainable development 20 years on from the earth summit: progress, gaps and strategic guidelines for Latin America and the Caribbean," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1427 edited by Eclac.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geiser, Hans, 2010. "Sustainable development from a human rights perspective and the challenges it represents for the Caribbean SIDS (a discussion paper)," Studies and Perspectives – ECLAC Subregional Headquarters for The Caribbean 5061, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Geiser, Hans, 2010. "Sustainable development from a human rights perspective and the challenges it represents for the Caribbean SIDS (a discussion paper)," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL para el Caribe (Estudios e Investigaciones) 5061, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Baker, J.S. & Wade, C.M. & Sohngen, B.L. & Ohrel, S. & Fawcett, A.A., 2019. "Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-401.
    4. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    5. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    6. Roffe, Pedro & Santa Cruz, Maximiliano, 2007. "Intellectual property rights and sustainable development: a survey of major issues," Documentos de Proyectos 3591, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    7. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    8. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    10. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    11. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.
    12. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Nora Mzavanadze, 2009. "Building A Framework For National Sustainable Development Assessment And Application For Lithuania: Sustainability In Transition," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 97-130.
    14. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    15. Isin Ceti̇n, 2017. "Accounting Requirements And Records On Bank Subscribed Capital Compliance With European Directives," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 52-68, February.
    16. Jean-Michel Sahuta & Sandrine Boulerne & Medhi Mili & Frédéric Teulon, 2014. "What Relation Exists Between Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) And Longevity Of Firms?," Working Papers 2014-248, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    17. Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon & Pete Bettinger & Jacek Siry & Bin Mei & Jesse Abrams, 2019. "The Terms Foresters and Planners in the United States Use to Infer Sustainability in Forest Management Plans: A Survey Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Shehu Folaranmi Gbolahan Yusuf & Oluwabunmi Oluwaseun Popoola & Lindokhule Gwala & Thinandavha Nesengani, 2021. "Promoting University–Community Alliances in the Experiential Learning Activities of Agricultural Extension Postgraduate Students at the University of Fort Hare, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Filipa Correia & Philipp Erfruth & Julie Bryhn, 2018. "The 2030 Agenda: The roadmap to GlobALLizaton," Working Papers 156, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    20. Choy Yee Keong, 2005. "Sustainable Development—An Institutional Enclave (with Special Reference to the Bakun Dam–Induced Development Strategy in Malaysia)," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 951-971, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col016:2937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.