IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v16y2018i4p533-544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Looping Minds: How Cognitive Science Exerts Influence on Its Findings

Author

Listed:
  • Toma Strle

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Drawing on the distinction between natural and human kinds, I will discuss the looping effects of human kinds through the lens of contemporary cognitive (neuro)science. I will try to show that cognitive science is mainly in the business of investigating, understanding and explaining human kinds. As new conceptualisations of the human mind, agency and our nature are being created (by, for instance, neuroscience), they open up the possibility for new, different understandings of what it means to be a human being. This, I will argue, can change how people think and behave and thus change the very phenomena cognitive science investigates. Consequently, cognitive science can affect its very (future) findings. This holds especially true when society embraces new conceptualisations of the human mind and new ways of self-understanding become part and parcel of social discourse, activities, and/or structures. The quest for understanding the human mind, I will claim, is a looping journey, where what we "discover" about the human mind is inherently dependent on how we, as human beings, understand ourselves; and how we understand ourselves is, to a certain degree, dependent on how science understands us and on how we interpret what it has to say about our nature. At the end of the article, this will lead me to consider cognitive science as an intrinsically ethical endeavour.

Suggested Citation

  • Toma Strle, 2018. "Looping Minds: How Cognitive Science Exerts Influence on Its Findings," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(4), pages 533-544.
    • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:16:y:2018:i:4:p:533-544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://indecs.eu/2018/indecs2018-pp533-544.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Racine, Eric & Waldman, Sarah & Rosenberg, Jarett & Illes, Judy, 2010. "Contemporary neuroscience in the media," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(4), pages 725-733, August.
    2. Urban Kordes, 2015. "A better metaphor for understanding consciousness?," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 13(4), pages 525-533.
    3. Florian Klauser & Urban Kordes, 2018. "Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(4), pages 524-532.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Florian Klauser & Urban Kordes, 2018. "Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(4), pages 524-532.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nettleton, Sarah & Kitzinger, Jenny & Kitzinger, Celia, 2014. "A diagnostic illusory? The case of distinguishing between “vegetative” and “minimally conscious” states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 134-141.
    2. Kvaale, Erlend P. & Gottdiener, William H. & Haslam, Nick, 2013. "Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 95-103.
    3. Gregory, Hollin, 2020. "Making a murderer: Media renderings of brain injury and Aaron Hernandez as a medical and sporting subject," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    4. Florian Klauser & Urban Kordes, 2018. "Loops and Recursions in Cognitive Science: Cross-Roads between Methodology and Epistemology," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 16(4), pages 524-532.
    5. O'Connor, Cliodhna & Joffe, Helene, 2013. "Media representations of early human development: Protecting, feeding and loving the developing brain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 297-306.
    6. Choudhury, Suparna & McKinney, Kelly A. & Merten, Moritz, 2012. "Rebelling against the brain: Public engagement with the ‘neurological adolescent’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 565-573.
    7. Arentshorst, Marlous E. & de Cock Buning, Tjard & Broerse, Jacqueline E.W., 2016. "Exploring responsible innovation: Dutch public perceptions of the future of medical neuroimaging technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 8-18.
    8. Gardner, John & Warren, Narelle & Addison, Courtney & Samuel, Gabby, 2019. "Persuasive bodies: Testimonies of deep brain stimulation and Parkinson's on YouTube," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 44-51.
    9. Olga Markic, 2017. "Extended Cognition: Feedback Loops and Coupled Systems," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 15(4), pages 270-280.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agency; cognitive neuroscience; human kinds; objectivity; self-referentiality; sociality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:16:y:2018:i:4:p:533-544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.