Author
Listed:
- Dhurba Banjade
(Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Gauradaha Campus, Nepal)
- Aman Shrestha
(Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Gauradaha Campus, Nepal)
- Asmita Khanal
(Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Nepal)
Abstract
One of the most serious foliar diseases limiting wheat productivity in Nepal is loose smut induced by Ustilago tritice. To assess how 12 wheat varieties responded to loose smut produced by Ustilago tritice, a field experiment was carried up in the field of Sandhikharka muncipality-1, Arghakhanchi, Nepal from 5 December 2022 to 10 April 2023. Three replications and 12 treatments were used in the randomized complete block design (RCBD) experiment. The size of each treatment plot was 2 m2, and the entire research field measured 152.5 m2. Double-digit scoring was used to determine the severity of the disease, commencing at the heading stage, with four scorings completed seven days apart in accordance with the Zadok scale. Leaf area (LA), plant height (PH), silk emergence per head, spike length (SL), smutted head(SH), number of spore masses per head, number of grains per spike, plot yield (PY), test weight, and thousand kernel weight (TKW) were among the features used to calculate the score. It was determined and examined what the mean AUDPC was. The mean AUDPC values varied substantially amongst the variations. The cultivars were divided into four groups based on their mean AUDPC values: resistant, moderately resistant, susceptible, and severely susceptible. The relationship between 12 types and the AUDPC and other features was also examined. Khumal shakti, one of 12 kinds, had the largest disease increase (AUDPC value: 859.73), making it the most vulnerable, while WK-1204 had the lowest (AUDPC value: 321.5), making it the most resistant. AUDPC values of 355.7, 368.3, and 365.2 for Annapurna, Zinc Gahun-1, and Zinc Gahun-2, respectively, were also discovered to be resistant to loose smut. No variants with great resistance were discovered. Similar to Swargadwari, Gautam, Tilottama, Vijaya, and Bhrikuti, these varieties showed some resistance to loose smut of wheat. Aditaya and Badhganga were prone to loose smut. Therefore, WK1204 performing better at Sandhikharka may be considered as the source of tolerance in further tests, while Khumal Shakti can be used as a susceptible check. These varieties can therefore be recommended for inclusion in breeding programs.
Suggested Citation
Dhurba Banjade & Aman Shrestha & Asmita Khanal, 2023.
"Field Experiment To Evaluate The Response Of Different Varieties Of Wheat Against Loose Smut In Arghakhanchi District Of Nepal,"
Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 34-38, June.
Handle:
RePEc:zib:zbtaec:v:4:y:2023:i:2:p:34-38
DOI: 10.26480/taec.02.2023.34.38
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbtaec:v:4:y:2023:i:2:p:34-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://taec.com.my/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.