IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbtaec/v4y2023i1p11-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COMPARISON OF BITTER GOURD (Momordica Charantia L.) VARIETIES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF SALT STRESS

Author

Listed:
  • Maqsood Ali Wagan

    (Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan)

  • Farhan Ali Wagan

    (Department of Plant Pathology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan)

  • Tanveer Fatima Miano

    (Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan)

  • Musib-U-Rahman Channa

    (Department of Entomology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tando Jam, Pakistan)

Abstract

The experiment was performed during 2022 to compare Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) varieties under the influence of salt stress. And three-replicated Completely Randomized Design (CRD) design was used for its layout (factorial). The bitter gourd that was grown in canal water (the control) ended up coming in first place. It had a germination rate of 73.68%, a germination index of 1.83%, a vine length of 14.64 cm, a leaves of 5.06 plant, a root length of 13.02 cm, a root biomass of 1.33 g,. The bitter gourd was provided with 2 dSm1 and it finished in second place. It had a germination rate of 63.64%, a germination index of 1.67, a vine length of 14.08 cm, a leaf yield of 4.94 leaves plant, a root length of 12.51 cm, a root biomass of 1.23 g, %. The bitter gourd came in third place after receiving 4 dSm1 and achieving the following results: a germination rate of 39.33%, a germination index of 1.33, a vine length of 12.75 cm, a leaf yield of 4.84 leaves plant, a root length of 10.35 cm, and 1.11 g from its roots, This The plants that were given 6 dSm1 had a germination rate of 37.23 %, a germination index of 1.21, a vine length of 8.63 cm 4.32 leaves per plant, a root length of 9.19 cm, 0.88 g of root biomass, from their leaves, which placed them in fourth place. In a manner analogous, the Bitter gourd 8 dSm1 had a germination rate of 31.93%, a germination index of 0.92, a vine length of 6.15 cm, a leaf yield of 4.10 leaves plant, a root length of 8.06 cm, a root biomass of 0.57 g, . All of these measurements were taken in the Kiran variety performed the best out of those that were examined. It had a germination rate of 56.52 %, an index of 4.42, a vine length of 11.33 cm, a leaf yield of 4.67 per plant, a root length of 10.63 cm, a root biomass of 1.54 g,. Additionally Peshawar, the variety that came in second place, had a germination rate of 41.8 %, a germination index of 4.02, a vine length of 11.17 cm, a leaf yield of 4.63 leaves per plant, a root length of 10.62 cm, , a root biomass of 0.51 g, These are the statistics that were used to According to the findings of this experiment; bitter gourds that were subjected to treatment with canal water (the control) exhibited the greatest rates of the germination and vegetative growth and developments, followed by bitter gourds that were subjected to treatment with either 2 or 4 dSm¹.

Suggested Citation

  • Maqsood Ali Wagan & Farhan Ali Wagan & Tanveer Fatima Miano & Musib-U-Rahman Channa, 2023. "COMPARISON OF BITTER GOURD (Momordica Charantia L.) VARIETIES UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF SALT STRESS," Tropical Agroecosystems (TAEC), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 11-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbtaec:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:11-14
    DOI: 10.26480/taec.01.2023.11.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://taec.com.my/archives/1taec2023/1taec2023-11-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/taec.01.2023.11.14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbtaec:v:4:y:2023:i:1:p:11-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://taec.com.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.