Author
Listed:
- Johnson Ajidahun
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
- Oluwasanmi Ayodele Olabode
(Department of Petroleum Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria)
- Michael Tomisin Asubiojo
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
- Temitayo Daniel Johnson
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
- Temitayo Olamide Ale
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
- Kazeem Oladimeji Olomo
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
- Oluyemi Emmanuel Faseki
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
- Odunayo Bolanle Agunloye
(Department of Earth Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria)
Abstract
This study analyzed “Shula field” offshore Niger Delta basin for it hydrocarbon bearing capacity. Well logs and seismic data were used for the analysis. Well logs consisting of gamma ray, resistivity, neutron and density logs for five different wells were used. Gamma ray logs aided lithological identification, resistivity logs were used to delineate hydrocarbon bearing zones while a combination of neutron and density logs aided in distinguishing oil and gas zones. Three hydrocarbon bearing sands (reservoirs) of varying thickness designated as RES-AA, RES-BB and RES-CC were identified. Well log correlation of the five wells revealed lateral continuity of the sand units thinning out in northwestern direction of the study field. The range values of gross thickness (GT), net-to-gross (NTG), volume of shale (VSH), effective porosity (ΦEff), permeability (K), hydrocarbon saturation (Sh) and water saturation (SW) for RES-AA reservoir are 51-74ft, 0.88-98%, 0.10-11%, 24-28%, 174-734mD, 8-80%, and 20-92% respectively. RES-BB reservoir range values of (GT), (NTG), (VSH), (ΦEff), (K), (Sh) and (SW) are 47-65ft, 83-98%, 8-14%, 24-32%, 234-1880mD, 4-78%, and 22-96% respectively while the RES-CC reservoir range values of (GT), (NTG), (VSH), (ΦEff), (K), (Sh) and (SW) are 121-191ft, 82-96%, 8-11%, 23-31%, 125-1352mD, 9-88% and 12-91% respectively. Sixteen faults were identified and interpreted comprising of nine synthetic and seven antithetic faults. The time and depth structural maps show the subsurface structural geometry and possible hydrocarbon migration and trapping potential. The probable structure trapping hydrocarbon in the study field is anticlinal structure and four-way closure. The volumetric calculation revealed that reservoir RES-AA has 951 × 106 bbl, reservoir RES-BB has 1058 × 106 bbl and reservoir RES-CC has 1688 × 106 bbl of oil originally in place (OIIP). Generally, the petrophysical results and the volumetric calculation for the field confirm an economically viable investment potential except for reservoir RES-AA, wellbore ZY-005 with 8% Sh, reservoir RES-BB, wellbore ZY-003 and ZY-005 with 4% Sh, and 7% Sh respectively and reservoir RES-CC, wellbore ZY-005 with 9% Sh. Therefore, these four reservoir units may be screen out during production to reduce the rate of water cut thereby increasing the producing life of the field.
Suggested Citation
Johnson Ajidahun & Oluwasanmi Ayodele Olabode & Michael Tomisin Asubiojo & Temitayo Daniel Johnson & Temitayo Olamide Ale & Kazeem Oladimeji Olomo & Oluyemi Emmanuel Faseki & Odunayo Bolanle Agunloye, 2023.
"Reservoir Characterization Of The ‘Shula Field’, Offshore Niger Delta Basin, Nigeria: An Integrated Approach,"
Geological Behavior (GBR), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 43-52, December.
Handle:
RePEc:zib:zbngbr:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:43-52
DOI: 10.26480/gbr.01.2023.43.52
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbngbr:v:7:y:2023:i:1:p:43-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://geologicalbehavior.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.