Author
Listed:
- Md. Abdus Salam
(Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh)
- Suriaya Perveen
(Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh)
- Md. Ekram ul Haque
(Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh)
Abstract
The selections of suitable variety are very crucial for addressing future challenges and sustainably increase rice production in the flood-prone rice-growing environment. To find out the degree of tolerance of different submergence tolerant varieties under different submergence durations we conducted the present research from July to December, 2018. The experiment comprised of two factors namely, factor A, Submergence durations were S0-control (no submergence situation), S1, S2,and S3 allowing submergence up to 10 days after seedling establishment (DAE), submergence up to 15 DAE, and submergence up to 20 DAE, respectively and factor B- Submergence tolerant varieties were Binadhan-11, Binadhan-12, BRRI dhan52, and BRRI dhan79. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design where submergence durations were assigned to the main plots and varieties were assigned to the subplots with three replications. The highest grain yield (4.09 t ha-1) was obtained from no submergence situation with BRRI dhan52 followed by no submergence with variety Binadhan-11 (3.87 t ha-1), submergence up to 10 days after seedling establishment (3.61 t ha-1), and submergence up to 15 days after seedling establishment (3.35 t ha-1) with variety BRRI dhan52. Among four submergence tolerant varieties, BRRI dhan52 showed better performance.Thus, it may be concluded that submergence up to 10 or 15 days after seedling establishment with variety BRRI dhan52 might be cultivated in flood-affected areas where rice plants remain 10 to 15 days under floodwater.
Suggested Citation
Md. Abdus Salam & Suriaya Perveen & Md. Ekram ul Haque, 2021.
"Responses Of Four Submergence Tolerant Rice Varieties To Different Submergence Levels,"
Big Data In Agriculture (BDA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 68-73, July.
Handle:
RePEc:zib:zbnbda:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:68-73
DOI: 10.26480/bda.02.2021.68.73
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnbda:v:3:y:2021:i:2:p:68-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://bigdatainagriculture.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.