IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbjwbm/v5y2023i1p01-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response Of Biofertilizer In Conjunction With Different Levels Of Inorganic Fertilizer In Cauliflower (Brassica Oleracea Var. Botrytis) Production At Chitwan, Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Sudha Bhandari

    (Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Rampur Campus, Khairahani, Chitwan Nepal)

  • Himani Singh

    (Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Rampur Campus, Khairahani, Chitwan Nepal)

  • Sahara Shrestha

    (Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Rampur Campus, Khairahani, Chitwan Nepal)

  • Krishna Aryal

    (Department of Soil Science, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Post Graduate Program, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal)

Abstract

The crop growth with its yield and yield-attributing character of Kathmandu local variety of cauliflower was evaluated under different levels of the recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer and bio-fertilizer inoculation at Khairahani, Chitwan during the winter season from December 2021 to February 2022. The experiment was laid out into two factorial Randomized Complete Block Design with three different levels of NPK (Viz:100% NPK-120:60:50, 75% NPK-90:45:37.5, and 50% NPK-60:30:25) and bio-fertilizer (Viz: No inoculation, Azotobacter inoculation, VAM inoculation, and Azotobacter +VAM inoculation). The treatments were replicated thrice. Azotobacter was inoculated by dipping seedlings into 10% (V/V) solution for 30 minutes whereas, VAM was inoculated at the rate of 4 Kg ha-1 by soil application. The results revealed that significantly higher plant height (50.57cm), number of leaves (13.42), plant spread (55.60cm), leaf area index (2.41) at harvest, and days to 100% curding (77.62), curd weight (265.6 gm), curd diameter (26.10 cm) and marketable curd yield (8.41ton ha-1) was recorded under 100% NPK fertilizer. Regarding bio-fertilizer, inoculation with Azotobacter + VAM recorded significantly higher plant height (49.15 cm), number of leaves (14.22), leaf area index (2.51), plant spread (57.52 cm) at harvest, days to 50% curding (70.22), days to 100% curding (77.6), curd diameter (25.72 cm), curd weight (249.1 gm) and marketable curd yield (8.11-ton ha-1) as compared to that of the treatment with no inoculation. Interaction between the inorganic fertilizer and biofertilizer was seen as significant in plant height at 30 days after transplanting. Thus, it can be suggested that the application of a 100% recommended dose of NPK fertilizer and Azotobacter + VAM inoculation enhances the production of cauliflower.

Suggested Citation

  • Sudha Bhandari & Himani Singh & Sahara Shrestha & Krishna Aryal, 2023. "Response Of Biofertilizer In Conjunction With Different Levels Of Inorganic Fertilizer In Cauliflower (Brassica Oleracea Var. Botrytis) Production At Chitwan, Nepal," Journal of Wastes and Biomass Management (JWBM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 01-07, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbjwbm:v:5:y:2023:i:1:p:01-07
    DOI: 10.26480/jwbm.01.2023.01.07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jwbm.com.my/archives/1jwbm2023/1jwbm2023-01-07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/jwbm.01.2023.01.07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbjwbm:v:5:y:2023:i:1:p:01-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jwbm.com.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.