Author
Listed:
- M.A.N. Anikwe
(Department of Agronomy and Ecological Management, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.)
- Nnamnani D.E
(Department of Agronomy and Ecological Management, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.)
- Ikengannyia E.E
(Department of Agronomy and Ecological Management, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.)
- J.C. Eze
(Department of Agronomy and Ecological Management, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria.)
- Obidike-Ugwu, E. O
(Humid Forest Research Station, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria.)
Abstract
Management efficiency can increase crop productivity through enhanced N2 fixation in the plant-soil system. This study examined soil tillage variants and sulphur fertilization effects on nodulation, N2 fixation effectiveness and yield of Bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea] in a degraded Ultisol in Agbani Enugu, Southeast Nigeria. Twenty-four experimental units were laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). The six treatments comprised No-Till+No Gypsum (NTGo), No-Till+Gypsum1 (NTG1), No-Till+Gypsum2 (NTG2), Till+No Gypsum (TGo), Till+Gypsum1 (TG1), and Till+Gypsum2 (TG2). No-till+gypsum2 plots had significantly higher soil N content than each corresponding No-till+no gypsum plot by 15-40 %. At 30 DAP, the plots treated with till+gypsum1 (21 kg/ha), till+gypsum2 (42 kg/ha), no-till+gypsum2 (42 kg/ha), no-till+gypsum1 (21 kg/ha), and till+no gypsum had 62-63 % higher soil sulphur content (P= 0.05) than the control plots. The nodule count per plant in plots treated with no-till+gypsum2 (42 kg/ha) was greater than that in the control plot, plots with no-till+gypsum1 (21 kg/ha), and plots with till+gypsum2 (42 kg/ha) by 72-74 % at 30, 60, and 90 DAP across two seasons. Compared to the untreated plots, nodulation effectivity was raised by 79-89 % in the No-till+gypsum2 plot. The plots treated with no-till+gypsum2 (42 kg/ha) had the highest yield (0.94 t/ha), followed by plots treated with no-till+gypsum1 (42 kg/ha) with 0.93 t/ha dry seed yield and till+gypsum2 (42 kg/ha) with 54-55 % greater yield (P=0.05) than the control plot. Sulphur treatment boosted nodulation by 68 % and nodule effectiveness by about 78 %. The no-till+Gypsum2 application enhanced the average yield of Bambara groundnuts by 56 %. The soil application of S enhanced the amount of accessible S in the soil. Results show that the tillage system and S fertilization impact Bambara groundnut on degraded Ultisols. Dry matter yield was best with a high S supply in both S increments and no-till systems. The number and effectiveness of nodules increased at different S rates and no-tillage. Because of the increased S application rate, there was a considerable increase in N accumulation due to a greater N2 fixation rate. The study recommends using no-till systems and sulphur fertilization practices to enhance crop productivity, especially in degraded Ultisols. The study provides valuable insights into sustainable agriculture practices that boost yields while conserving soils.
Suggested Citation
M.A.N. Anikwe & Nnamnani D.E & Ikengannyia E.E & J.C. Eze & Obidike-Ugwu, E. O, 2023.
"SOIL TILLAGE VARIANTS AND SULPHUR FERTILIZATION AFFECT NODULATION,N2 FIXATION AND YIELD OF BAMBARA GROUNDNUT (Vigna subterreana)IN SOUTHEAST NIGERIA,"
Journal Clean WAS (JCleanWAS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 76-82, August.
Handle:
RePEc:zib:jclnws:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:76-82
DOI: 10.26480/jcleanwas.01.2023.76.82
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:jclnws:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:76-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jcleanwas.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.