IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/312560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Un)disclosed brand partnerships: How platform policies and interfaces shape commercial content for influencers

Author

Listed:
  • Annabell, Taylor
  • Aade, Laura
  • Goanta, Catalina

Abstract

Social media platforms mediate and regulate how influencers engage in monetisation practices. In this social-legal paper we examine one form of monetisation, influencer marketing, to understand how platform policies and interfaces shape commercial content for influencers. We situate our inquiry of governance by platforms within the governance of platforms, by focusing on the legal obligation to disclose commercial content under European consumer law. Combining an analysis of platform documentation for Instagram, TikTok, Snap, and YouTube, with insights from a walkthrough of each platform, we present five findings. First, we explore the terminology used by platforms to refer to influencers. Second, we outline how platforms frame commercial content and situate business models of influencer marketing. Third, we analyse how platforms present the duty to disclose commercial content and assign responsibility for compliance. Fourth, we examine how platforms facilitate disclosure through their in-app tools. Finally, we look at the articulation regarding the moderation of undisclosed commercial content by platforms. Our analysis unveils tensions between the law (governance of platforms) and what platforms do (governance by platforms). Overall, as platforms hold significant power in shaping monetisation practices, we argue that enforcing influencers' disclosure practices must be contextualised within the dynamics of platform governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Annabell, Taylor & Aade, Laura & Goanta, Catalina, 2024. "(Un)disclosed brand partnerships: How platform policies and interfaces shape commercial content for influencers," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:312560
    DOI: 10.14763/2024.4.1814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/312560/1/1918875855.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2024.4.1814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeNardis, L. & Hackl, A.M., 2015. "Internet governance by social media platforms," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 761-770.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Kerr, Aphra & Musiani, Francesca & Pohle, Julia, 2019. "Editorial – Communication and internet policy: a critical rights-based history and future," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16.
    3. Radu, Roxana & Kettemann, Matthias C. & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2021. "Normfare: Norm entrepreneurship in internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    4. Jia, Lianrui & Ruan, Lotus, 2020. "Going global: Comparing Chinese mobile applications' data and user privacy governance at home and abroad," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22.
    5. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    6. Hongyang He & Bin Zhang, 2022. "Effective Synergy of Market Agents: The Core of Achieving Multi-Agent Governance on the Internet Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Epstein, Dmitry & Katzenbach, Christian & Musiani, Francesca, 2016. "Doing internet governance: practices, controversies, infrastructures, and institutions," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14.
    8. Grygiel, Jennifer & Brown, Nina, 2019. "Are social media companies motivated to be good corporate citizens? Examination of the connection between corporate social responsibility and social media safety," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 445-460.
    9. Jacques Simon Song & Georges Ngnouwal Eloundou & Fabrice Bitoto Ewolo & Blaise Ondoua Beyene, 2024. "Does Social Media Contribute to Economic Growth?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8349-8389, June.
    10. Ruparel, Namita & Dhir, Amandeep & Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Islam, Jamid Ul, 2020. "The influence of online professional social media in human resource management: A systematic literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Rizki Briandana & Caturida Meiwanto Doktoralina & Shahir Akram Hassan & Wan Norhaniza Wan Hasan, 2020. "Da’wah Communication and Social Media: The Interpretation of Millennials in Southeast Asia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 216-226.
    12. El Hana, Nadr & Mercanti-Guérin, Maria & Sabri, Ouidade, 2023. "Cookiepocalypse: What are the most effective strategies for advertisers to reshape the future of display advertising?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Gray, Joanne Elizabeth, 2021. "The geopolitics of "platforms": The TikTok challenge," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26.
    14. Haenschen, Katherine & Wolf, Jordan, 2019. "Disclaiming responsibility: How platforms deadlocked the Federal Election Commission's efforts to regulate digital political advertising," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1-1.
    15. Chuanfeng Sun & Guihuang Jiang & Jingqiang Zhang, 2024. "An Analysis of Hotspots, Subject Structure, and Emerging Trends in Digital Governance Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    16. Kerr, Aphra & Musiani, Francesca & Pohle, Julia, 2019. "Editorial – Communication and internet policy: a critical rights-based history and future," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:312560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.