IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/214081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reframing platform power

Author

Listed:
  • van Dijck, José
  • Nieborg, David
  • Poell, Thomas

Abstract

This article addresses the problem of platform power by probing current regulatory frameworks' basic assumptions about how tech firms operate in digital ecosystems. Platform power is generally assessed in terms of economic markets in which individual corporate actors harness technological innovations to compete fairly, thereby maximising consumer welfare. We propose three paradigmatic shifts in the conceptualisation of platform power. First, we suggest to expand the notion of consumer welfare to citizen wellbeing, hence addressing a broader scope of platform services' beneficiaries. Second, we recommend considering platform companies as part of an integrated platform ecosystem, acknowledging its interrelational, dynamic structure. And third, we shift attention from markets as level playing fields towards societal platform infrastructures where hierarchies and dependencies are built into their architecture. Reframing platform power may be a necessary condition for updating and integrating current regulatory regimes and policy proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • van Dijck, José & Nieborg, David & Poell, Thomas, 2019. "Reframing platform power," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214081
    DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214081/1/IntPolRev-2019-2-1414.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2019.2.1414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gorwa, Robert & Lechowski, Grzegorz & Schneiß, Daniel, 2024. "Platform lobbying: Policy influence strategies and the EU's Digital Services Act," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26.
    2. Eujong Kim & Yeran Kim, 2024. "“Finally, Me Time!”: Korean Middle-Aged Women’s Platform Practices," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    3. Alvarez León, Luis F. & Aoyama, Yuko, 2022. "Industry emergence and market capture: The rise of autonomous vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Gorwa, Robert, 2024. "The Politics of Platform Regulation: How Governments Shape Online Content Moderation," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 299876, September.
    5. Jia, Lianrui & Ruan, Lotus, 2020. "Going global: Comparing Chinese mobile applications' data and user privacy governance at home and abroad," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(3), pages 1-22.
    6. Khan, Zaheer & Zeng, Jing & Knight, Gary & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Pattnaik, Chinmay, 2023. "Non-market strategies and disruptive innovation in the platform economy," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    7. Sergio Gorjón, 2021. "Bigtechs and financial services: some challenges, benefits and regulatory responses," Economic Bulletin, Banco de España, issue 4/2021.
    8. Broughton Micova, Sally & Jacques, Sabine, 2020. "Platform power in the video advertising ecosystem," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28.
    9. Wikström, Gustav & Bledow, Nona & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Breuer, Henning & Costa, Cristina & Darzanos, George & Gavras, Anastasius & Hossfeld, Tobias & Mesogiti, Ioanna & Petersen, Katrina & Poramba, 2024. "Key value indicators: A framework for values-driven next-generation ICT solutions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6).
    10. Filatova-Bilous, Nataliia, 2021. "Once again platform liability: On the edge of the "Uber" and "Airbnb" cases," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(2), pages 1-27.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.