IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/260538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fridays for Future in der Corona-Krise: Welche Mobilisierungskraft haben Online-Proteste?

Author

Listed:
  • Hunger, Sophia
  • Hutter, Swen

Abstract

Die Corona-Krise hat Fridays for Future (FFF) – wie auch andere soziale Bewegungen – mit nicht absehbaren und einschneidenden Einschränkungen konfrontiert. Inwiefern kam es aufgrund dieser radikal veränderten Situation zu einer Anpassung des Handlungsrepertoires von FFF? Und ermöglichen online bzw. hybride Protestaktionen eine Ausweitung des Mobilisierungspotentials durch die Einbindung von geographischen Einheiten, die bisher nicht an die Bewegung angeschlossen waren? Diesen Fragen nähern wir uns in diesem Beitrag mittels neuer online-generierter Datenquellen. Dabei greifen wir auf Informationen zu den Teilnehmer*innen und Protestformen des Online-Streiks vom 24. April und des Klimastreiks vom 25. September 2020 zurück. Unsere deskriptiven Analysen zeigen regionale Varianzen in der Protestintensität und Innovationen in den Protestformen. Darauf aufbauend nutzen wir die geographisch kleinteilige Struktur der Daten, um in Regressionsanalysen etablierte Erklärungsfaktoren für die Mobilisierungskraft von FFF zu testen. Generell weisen die Ergebnisse auf keine deutliche Erweiterung der Mobilisierung hin: FFF konnte während der Pandemie besonders stark in urbanen, grün wählenden Gebieten mit hohem Bildungsniveau und Frauenanteil in Bevölkerung und Politik mobilisieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Hunger, Sophia & Hutter, Swen, 2021. "Fridays for Future in der Corona-Krise: Welche Mobilisierungskraft haben Online-Proteste?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 34(2), pages 218-234.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:260538
    DOI: 10.1515/fjsb-2021-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/260538/1/Full-text-article-Hunger-et-al-Fridays-for-future.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/fjsb-2021-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grande, Edgar & Vidal, Guillem, 2020. "A vote for Europe? The 2019 EP elections from the voters' perspective," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Center for Civil Society Research ZZ 2020-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Braun & Edgar Grande, 2021. "Politicizing Europe in Elections to the European Parliament (1994–2019): The Crucial Role of Mainstream Parties," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1124-1141, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:260538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.