IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/afmpwm/261119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kreislaufwirtschaft durch Co-Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Walcher, Dominik
  • Leube, Michael G

Abstract

Der Umbau der gegenwärtigen Linearwirtschaft in eine Kreislaufwirtschaft ist Gegenstand des Aktionsplans der Europäischen Kommission, um einerseits Umweltbelastung und Ressourcenverbrauch zu minimieren sowie andererseits die Wirtschaft neu zu positionieren und wettbewerbsfähiger zu machen. Stoffströme werden einerseits geschlossen, unternehmerische Wertschöpfungsprozesse für Interaktionen mit Kunden andererseits geöffnet. Ziel des Beitrags ist es, die Bedeutung von "Co-Creation" zur Ausgestaltung von Wertschöpfungsprozessen und Geschäftsmodellen für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung der Kreislaufwirtschaft darzustellen.

Suggested Citation

  • Walcher, Dominik & Leube, Michael G, 2017. "Kreislaufwirtschaft durch Co-Creation," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 2(01/2017), pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:afmpwm:261119
    DOI: 10.15459/95451.15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/261119/1/afm-praxiswissen-01-2017-s001-020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15459/95451.15?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonifield, Carolyn & Cole, Catherine & Schultz, Randall L., 2010. "Product returns on the Internet: A case of mixed signals?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1058-1065, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhanwei Tian & Guoqing Zhang, 2021. "Multi-echelon fulfillment warehouse rent and production allocation for online direct selling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 427-451, September.
    2. Kim, Junyong & Wansink, Brian, 2012. "How Retailers’ Recommendation and Return Policies Alter Product Evaluations," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 528-541.
    3. Wenyan Zhou & Oliver Hinz, 2016. "Determining profit-optimizing return policies – a two-step approach on data from taobao.com," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 26(2), pages 103-114, May.
    4. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. Johnson, Clark D. & Bauer, Brittney C. & Kelting, Katie & Jankuhn, Nicolas & Sim, Woojong, 2021. "Location, location … mailing location? The impact of address as a signal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 326-337.
    6. Rokonuzzaman, Md & Iyer, Pramod & Harun, Ahasan, 2021. "Return policy, No joke: An investigation into the impact of a retailer's return policy on consumers' decision making," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Li, Yongjian & Xu, Lei & Li, Dahui, 2013. "Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 451-460.
    8. Jeng, Shih-Ping, 2017. "Increasing customer purchase intention through product return policies: The pivotal impacts of retailer brand familiarity and product categories," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 182-189.
    9. Joon Yong Seo & Sukki Yoon & Milena Vangelova, 2016. "Shopping plans, buying motivations, and return policies: impacts on product returns and purchase likelihoods," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 645-659, December.
    10. Mills, Paul & Groening, Christopher, 2021. "The role of social acceptability and guilt in unethical consumer behavior: Following the crowd or their own moral compass?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 377-388.
    11. Xu, Xun & Jackson, Jonathan E., 2019. "Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 118-132.
    12. Gianfranco Walsh & Michael Möhring, 2017. "Effectiveness of product return-prevention instruments: Empirical evidence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(4), pages 341-350, November.
    13. Hjort, Klas & Lantz, Björn, 2016. "The impact of returns policies on profitability: A fashion e-commerce case," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4980-4985.
    14. Sanxi Li & Jun Yu & Mingsheng Zhang, 2024. "Search Prominence with Costly Product Returns," Papers 2410.06791, arXiv.org.
    15. Huseyn Abdulla & James D. Abbey & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "How consumers value retailer's return policy leniency levers: An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(4), pages 1719-1733, April.
    16. Overstreet, Robert E. & Morgan, Tyler R. & Laczniak, Russell N. & Daugherty, Patricia J., 2022. "Stemming the tide of increasing retail returns: Implications of targeted returns policies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 551-562.
    17. Anke Lepthien & Michel Clement, 2019. "Shipping fee schedules and return behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 151-165, June.
    18. Li, Bo & Jiang, Yushan, 2019. "Impacts of returns policy under supplier encroachment with risk-averse retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 104-115.
    19. Pei, Zhi & Paswan, Audhesh & Yan, Ruiliang, 2014. "E-tailer׳s return policy, consumer׳s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 249-257.
    20. Bahn, Kenneth D. & Boyd, Eric, 2014. "Information and its impact on consumers׳ reactions to restrictive return policies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 415-423.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:afmpwm:261119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arbeitsgemeinschaft.marketing/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.