Author
Abstract
I thought that the best way, for me, to honour G-R’s memories was not simply to show how relevant his contribution has been to the history of economic thought, rather than try to develop his work on bioeconomics, the field to which he dedicated the last 25 years of his life and which he explicitly considered the most important. Georgescu-Roegen’s bioeconomic theory represents first of all a radical criticism of neo-classical theory. It has pointed out the limitations, which are basically of an entropic nature, to which the process of economic development and growth are subject. According to the law of entropy, every productive activity involves the irreversible degradation of increasing amounts of energy and, in certain conditions, of matter. Since the biosphere is a closed system, exchanging energy but not matter with the environment, two important conclusions may be drawn as far as economics is concerned. The first conclusion is that the basic objective of the economic process, i.e the unlimited growth of production, in being founded on the use of non-renewable sources of energy and matter, contradicts the fundamental laws of thermodynamics. This objective must, therefore, be set aside or, at least, radically reconsidered. The second conclusion is of a methodological nature: the pendular representation of the economic process, found in the opening pages of any handbook on economics, according to which demand stimulates production, and the latter provides the income necessary to create a new demand, in a reversible process that is apparently capable of reproducing itself ad infinitum, must be replaced by an evolutionary model in which the economic process is seen to follows the course of time, and is thus irreversible. G-R, who understood perfectly well how central the problem of change is in order to interpret the economic process correctly, thus based his analysis of the process of production quite intentionally on the distinction between flows and funds.
Suggested Citation
Mauro BONAIUTI, 2008.
"The Paradoxes of Growth: toward a Systemic Approach to Economic Theory,"
Timisoara Journal of Economics, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(2), pages 135-146.
Handle:
RePEc:wun:journl:tje:v01:y2008:i02:a01
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wun:journl:tje:v01:y2008:i02:a01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romeo Margea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuvtro.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.