IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/wepxxx/v04y2018i02ns2382624x16500430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralized Wastewater Systems in Bengaluru, India: Success or Failure?

Author

Listed:
  • Pradeep Kuttuva

    (Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain†Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bengaluru, India)

  • Sharachchandra Lele

    (#x2020;Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Bengaluru, India)

  • Gara Villalba Mendez

    (Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Decentralized wastewater treatment and reuse (DWTRU) using small-scale on-site sewage treatment plants (STPs) is an attractive solution addressing the problems of water pollution and scarcity, especially in rapidly urbanizing cities in developing countries, where centralized infrastructure for wastewater treatment is inadequate. But decentralized systems face several challenges (economic feasibility, public acceptance) that need to be better understood. The city of Bengaluru in India provides an excellent opportunity to evaluate such systems. In 2004, in an effort to curb the alarming levels of pollution in its water bodies due to untreated sewage disposal, the environmental regulatory agency mandated apartment complexes above a certain size to install STPs and reuse 100% of their wastewater, resulting in the installation of more than 2200 on-site STPs till date. This study attempts to analyze the factors influencing the extent of treatment and reuse in such systems, through structured surveys of residential associations, STP experts and government officials. The results are analyzed using a framework that integrates the technology adoption literature with the monitoring and enforcement literature. The study indicates that, while no apartment complex is able to reuse 100% of its treated water, there exists significant variation across apartment complexes in the level of treatment and reuse (from partial to poor) due to a complex mix of economies of scale, the price of fresh water, the level of enforcement and awareness, and technological choices made under information asymmetry. Only apartments dependent on expensive tanker water supply had clear economic incentives to comply with the order. Yet many large complexes that depended on low-priced utility or borewell supply were partially compliant, owing partly to lower (although positive) costs, higher level of formal enforcement and perhaps greater environmental awareness. On the other hand, the high treatment cost pushed smaller complexes to curtail the operation of their STPs (and the lower levels of enforcement further worsened this), resulting in inadequate treated water quality and consequently low reuse levels. The study recommends relaxing the infeasible 100% reuse criterion, and raising the threshold size above which DWTRU should be mandated so as to reduce the cost burden and increase enforceability. Subsidies towards capital costs and enabling resale of treated water will enable wider adoption. DWTRU is an apparently attractive solution that however, requires judicious policy-making and implementation to succeed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pradeep Kuttuva & Sharachchandra Lele & Gara Villalba Mendez, 2018. "Decentralized Wastewater Systems in Bengaluru, India: Success or Failure?," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(02), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:04:y:2018:i:02:n:s2382624x16500430
    DOI: 10.1142/S2382624X16500430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2382624X16500430
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S2382624X16500430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amerasinghe, Priyani H. & Bhardwaj, Rajendra Mohan & Scott, C. & Jella, Kiran & Marshall, Fiona, 2013. "Urban wastewater and agricultural reuse challenges in India," IWMI Research Reports 158342, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Amerasinghe, Priyani H. & Bhardwaj, Rajendra Mohan & Scott, Christopher A. & Jella, Kiran & Marshall, Fiona, 2013. "Urban wastewater and agricultural reuse challenges in India," IWMI Reports 147104, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Amerasinghe, Priyanie & Bhardwaj, R. M. & Scott, C. & Jella, Kiran & Marshall, F., 2013. "Urban wastewater and agricultural reuse challenges in India," IWMI Research Reports H045769, International Water Management Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muzioreva, Happison & Gumbo, Trynos & Kavishe, Neema & Moyo, Thembani & Musonda, Innocent, 2022. "Decentralized wastewater system practices in developing countries: A systematic review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chandrakant D. Thatte, 2018. "Water resources development in India," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 16-27, January.
    2. Kumar, M. Dinesh, 2018. "Input Delivery System in Agriculture including Irrigation and Other Services and their Efficiency: The Role of Finance Sector," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 73(01), January.
    3. Marshall, Fiona & Dolley, Jonathan, 2019. "Transformative innovation in peri-urban Asia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 983-992.
    4. Dennis Wichelns, 2015. "Achieving Water and Food Security in 2050: Outlook, Policies, and Investments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-33, April.
    5. Hanna Karg & Pay Drechsel & Edmund K. Akoto-Danso & Rüdiger Glaser & George Nyarko & Andreas Buerkert, 2016. "Foodsheds and City Region Food Systems in Two West African Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Never, Babette, 2016. "Wastewater systems and energy saving in urban India: governing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus series," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Karthick Radhakrishnan & Sukanya Das, 2019. "Application of Stochastic Frontier Production Function in Sugarcane Industry-treated Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture: Case Study of a Coastal District in Tamil Nadu, India," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 18(2), pages 185-200, December.
    8. Karpouzoglou, Timothy & Marshall, Fiona & Mehta, Lyla, 2018. "Towards a peri-urban political ecology of water quality decline," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 485-493.
    9. Folake Monsurat Babalola & Lena Breitenmoser & Claire Furlong & Paul Campling & Christine Maria Hooijmans, 2023. "Occupational Health Risk Assessment for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Kanpur, India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. KS Rajmohan & C Ramya & Sunita Varjani, 2021. "Trends and advances in bioenergy production and sustainable solid waste management," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(6), pages 1059-1085, September.
    11. Marshall, F. & Dolley, J. & Bisht, R. & Priya, R. & Waldman, L. & Amerasinghe, Priyanie & Randhawa, P., 2018. "Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation in urbanising contexts," IWMI Books, Reports H048775, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Amerasinghe, Priyani H. & Bhardwaj, Rajendra Mohan & Scott, C. & Jella, Kiran & Marshall, Fiona, 2013. "Urban wastewater and agricultural reuse challenges in India," IWMI Research Reports 158342, International Water Management Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:wepxxx:v:04:y:2018:i:02:n:s2382624x16500430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/wep/wep.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.