IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/tijaxx/v59y2024i03ns1094406024500124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitive Strategies for Small Audit Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ines Simac

    (Department of Accounting, Finance and Insurance, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Marleen Willekens

    (KU Leuven & BI Norwegian Business School, Department of Accounting, Finance, and Insurance, KU Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

SynopsisThe research problemWe examine whether small audit firms adopt niche strategies to compete in the public company audit market. To that end, we focus on auditors servicing clients from one industry only (which we label as a nationwide single-industry focus) and test its association with audit quality and pricing.MotivationPrior research on auditor competition has mainly focused on the large (mainly Big Four) audit firms. While large and small audit firm markets are two distinct markets, little is known about competitive strategies of small audit firms in the public company audit market.The test hypothesesOur first hypothesis is that small audit firms adopting a single-industry focused strategy supply higher audit quality compared with audit firms that do not adopt a single-industry focused strategy or a simple industry specialization strategy, ceteris paribus. Our second hypothesis is that small audit firms adopting a single-industry focused strategy engage in discount pricing compared with audit firms that do not adopt a single-industry focused strategy or a simple industry specialization strategy, ceteris paribus.Target populationThe U.S. commercial banking sector covering the period 2004–2020.Adopted methodologyMultivariate analyses adopting linear and probit models.AnalysesTo test our first hypothesis, we run a bank audit quality model using loan loss provisions as the dependent variable for our main analyses. Subsequent analyses adopt restatement, going concern, and internal control weaknesses models. To test our second hypothesis, we rely on a bank audit fee model. All models include relevant controls established in previous research and those for self-selection.FindingsThe evidence suggests that small audit firms adopting a nationwide single-industry focus are able to provide higher audit quality (compared with other rivals, even industry specialists) while at the same time charging lower audit fees implying cost efficiencies that are passed on to the client due to their focused expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Ines Simac & Marleen Willekens, 2024. "Competitive Strategies for Small Audit Firms," The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 59(03), pages 1-68, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:59:y:2024:i:03:n:s1094406024500124
    DOI: 10.1142/S1094406024500124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1094406024500124
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1094406024500124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitive strategy; small audit firms; single-industry focused auditors; banking industry; audit fees; audit quality differentiation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • L1 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:59:y:2024:i:03:n:s1094406024500124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/tija .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.