Author
Listed:
- Joseph Akadeagre Agana
(School of Business and Law, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway2Department of Accounting and Finance, School of Business, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, Kumasi, Ghana)
- Solomon George Zori
(Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgermeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands)
- Anna Alon
(School of Business and Law, University of Agder, Universitetsveien 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway)
Abstract
SynopsisThe research problemThis paper sought to ascertain whether IFRS adoption approaches impact accounting quality. Specifically, as some countries utilize IFRS without modifications while others modify IFRS to suit their local context, we aimed to test whether these differences in IFRS adoption approaches have implications for accounting quality.MotivationPrior studies focused on the impact of IFRS adoption on accounting quality without considering the different approaches used by the adopting jurisdictions. Such differences affect the version of IFRS utilized at the country level. We refer to jurisdictions as adopters of IFRS when the IASB’s version of IFRS is utilized without modifications. In contrast, jurisdictions where the IFRS standards are modified at the national or regional level are called adapters. We also recognize the role of enforcement; thus, we first examined whether IFRS adoption and enforcement influence accounting quality. Second, we compared the accounting quality for adopters and adapters of the standards.The test hypothesesOur first hypothesis is that the quality of enforcement has a stronger effect on accounting quality than the adoption of IFRS. Second, adapters will have higher accounting quality than adopters of IFRS.Target populationWe focused on the reporting of companies in African countries. These jurisdictions have not been sufficiently examined in prior studies.Adopted methodologyWe use panel data estimation, specifically, random-effects model.AnalysesWe examined accounting quality for pre- and post-IFRS reporting based on 3946 firm-year observations from six African countries over 18 years. Our analysis of the adoption approach is based on 3736 firm-year observations for companies utilizing IFRS. Except for Egypt, which used a modified version of IFRS, other countries in our sample utilized the IASB’s version of IFRS. Using various standard metrics for accounting quality (earnings management, timely loss recognition, and value relevance), we ascertained whether adaption is associated with higher accounting quality compared to adoption.FindingsThe results indicate that IFRS adoption and enforcement proxy are not associated with accounting quality, but other institutional factors are. Adoption of the standards is less important for accounting quality than the existing institutions. With regard to the adoption approach used, adopters demonstrated higher accounting quality for accounting-based measures, less income smoothing, and more timely loss recognition than the adapters. The adopters also exhibited greater value relevance, which suggests that their reporting was better able to capture information that affects firm value. The adoption approaches may influence different dimensions of accounting quality, and the resulting differences are important for users, companies, and standard setters to consider.
Suggested Citation
Joseph Akadeagre Agana & Solomon George Zori & Anna Alon, 2023.
"IFRS Adoption Approaches and Accounting Quality,"
The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 58(03), pages 1-36, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:58:y:2023:i:03:n:s1094406023500099
DOI: 10.1142/S1094406023500099
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
IFRS adoption;
IFRS adaption;
accounting quality;
Africa;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
- M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
- M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:58:y:2023:i:03:n:s1094406023500099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscinet/tija .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.