IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/rpbfmp/v23y2020i02ns0219091520500149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Risk in the Asia Pacific Region: A Clinical Death?

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Cong Thang

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

  • Tan Ngoc Vu

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

  • Trung Thanh Do

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

  • Vuong Minh Nguyen

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

  • Duc Hong Vo

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

Abstract

Beta is considered an important measure of systematic risk which is arguably present in an emerging market. Daily data for 2200 Australian listed firms is collected for the January 2007–December 2016 period. Various portfolios are considered. Days with announcements (the a-day) related to crucial macroeconomic news are allocated into the group which is separated from the n-day (nonannouncement days) group. Findings indicate that beta is negatively related to daily expected excess returns in the announcement days in comparison with the nonannouncement days. It is the claim of this paper that portfolio formations do matter when empirical studies on asset pricing are conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Cong Thang & Tan Ngoc Vu & Trung Thanh Do & Vuong Minh Nguyen & Duc Hong Vo, 2020. "Systematic Risk in the Asia Pacific Region: A Clinical Death?," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:23:y:2020:i:02:n:s0219091520500149
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219091520500149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091520500149
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219091520500149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:23:y:2020:i:02:n:s0219091520500149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.