IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/rpbfmp/v16y2013i01ns021909151350001x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pension Contributions and Earnings Quality

Author

Listed:
  • John Kim

    (Department of Economics, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Ave, NY, NY 10065, USA)

  • John Li

    (Department of Economics, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Ave, NY, NY 10065, USA)

  • Fang Sun

    (Department of Economics, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Ave, NY, NY 10065, USA)

Abstract

We investigate whether defined benefit (DB) pension contributions convey information about earnings quality proxied by different measurements of discretionary accruals (DA). We find that greater DA are negatively is associated with discretionary pension contributions. Since greater DA is associated with lower earnings quality, the result implies a positive relationship between earnings quality and voluntary pension contributions. In contrast, our evidence does not suggest a similar relationship holds for earnings quality and mandatory pension contributions. In addition, while our analysis identifies a negative relation between DA and total pension contributions, the relation is statistically weaker than that between DA and voluntary pension contribution. Robustness tests are conducted and results are found to continue to hold. Our results are consistent with the theoretical argument that voluntary pension contributions are indicative of firms' earnings quality since both the voluntary pension contributions and earnings quality result from the same set of incentives behind managerial discretions. Our study sheds light on the management's motivation for making voluntary pension contributions and improves our understanding of firms' consideration in funding strategies for DB pension plans.

Suggested Citation

  • John Kim & John Li & Fang Sun, 2013. "Pension Contributions and Earnings Quality," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:16:y:2013:i:01:n:s021909151350001x
    DOI: 10.1142/S021909151350001X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021909151350001X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S021909151350001X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F. Wang & Ting Zhang, 2014. "The effect of unfunded pension liabilities on corporate bond ratings, default risk, and recovery rate," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 781-802, November.
    2. Bikki Jaggi & Santanu Mitra & Mahmud Hossain, 2015. "Earnings quality, internal control weaknesses and industry-specialist audits," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 1-32, July.
    3. Avishek Bhandari & Babak Mammadov & Maya Thevenot, 2018. "The impact of executive inside debt on sell-side financial analyst forecast characteristics," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 283-315, August.
    4. Helena Isidro & José G. Dias, 2017. "Earnings quality and the heterogeneous relation between earnings and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1143-1165, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Defined benefit pension plan; discretionary pension contributions; mandatory pension contributions; information content; earnings quality; discretionary accruals; M48; G18; G32;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:16:y:2013:i:01:n:s021909151350001x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/rpbfmp/rpbfmp.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.