Author
Listed:
- Worapan Kusakunniran
(Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand)
- Thearith Ponn
(Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand)
- Nuttapol Boonsom
(Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand)
- Suwimol Wahakit
(Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand)
- Kittikhun Thongkanchorn
(Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand)
Abstract
This paper develops the Scopus H5-Index rankings, using the field of computer science as a case study. The challenge begins with the inconsistency of conference names. The rule-based approach is invented to automatically clean up duplicate conferences and assign unique pseudo ID for each conference. This data cleansing process is applied on conference names retrieved from both Scopus and ERA/CORE, in order to share common pseudo IDs for the sake of correlation analysis. The proposed data cleansing process is validated using ERA 2010 and CORE 2018 as references and reports the very small errors of 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively. Then, the Scopus H5-Index 2006–2010 and Scopus H5-Index 2014–2018 rankings are constructed and compared with the existing ERA 2010 and CORE 2018 rankings, respectively. The results show that the correlation within the Scopus H5-Index rankings (i.e. Scopus H5-Index 2006–2010 and Scopus H5-Index 2014–2018) is at the top of the moderate correlation band, where the correlation within the ERA/CORE rankings (ERA 2010 and CORE 2018) is at the top of the strong correlation band. While the correlations across ranking systems (i.e. Scopus H5-Index 2006–2010 vs. ERA 2010, and Scopus H5-Index 2014–2018 vs. CORE 2018) are at the bottom and middle of the moderate correlation band. It can be said that the quality assessment using the Scopus H5-Index ranking is more dynamic and quickly up-to-date when compared with the ERA/CORE ranking. Also, these two ranking systems are moderately correlated with each other for both periods of 2010 and 2018.
Suggested Citation
Worapan Kusakunniran & Thearith Ponn & Nuttapol Boonsom & Suwimol Wahakit & Kittikhun Thongkanchorn, 2021.
"Construction of H5-Index for Conference Ranking Indicator and its Correlation to ERA,"
Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-21, March.
Handle:
RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:20:y:2021:i:01:n:s0219649221500118
DOI: 10.1142/S0219649221500118
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:20:y:2021:i:01:n:s0219649221500118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jikm/jikm.shtml .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.