IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v14y2012i01ns1464333212500019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Representation And Specification Of Ecosystem Services: A Methodology Using Land Use/Land Cover Data And Stakeholder Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • W. R. SHEATE

    (Collingwood Environmental Planning (CEP) Ltd, UK;
    Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy, UK)

  • R. P. EALES

    (Collingwood Environmental Planning (CEP) Ltd, UK)

  • E. DALY

    (formerly CEP, now GHK Consulting, UK)

  • J. BAKER

    (Collingwood Environmental Planning (CEP) Ltd, UK)

  • A. MURDOCH

    (GeoData Institute, University of Southampton, UK)

  • C. HILL

    (GeoData Institute, University of Southampton, UK)

  • U. OJIKE

    (Imperial College London, Centre for Environmental Policy, UK)

  • T. KARPOUZOGLOU

    (University of Sussex, SPRU, Science & Technology Policy Research, UK)

Abstract

The challenge for implementing an ecosystems approach to environmental decision-making processes, such as spatial planning, is to understand the range, nature and amount of ecosystem services currently provided and the potential for such service provision in the future. The ability to spatially represent ecosystems services is a critical element of the evidence base on which to make decisions about how physical space is used most effectively and sustainably, and the way people and activities are distributed at different spatial scales. This paper reports on the outcomes of a research project originally undertaken for the UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which developed a methodology for mapping ecosystem services using GIS and readily available, existing land use/land cover datasets. Critical components of the methodology, in order to determine which datasets are appropriate for which services, are network analysis and stakeholder engagement techniques, to define the relevant typology of ecosystem services and their relationship to land use/land cover types. The methodology was developed and tested successfully in the context of green grid (green infrastructure) networks in a major UK regeneration area, the Thames Gateway, to the east of London, and its potential use in impact assessment further explored through a number of case studies.

Suggested Citation

  • W. R. Sheate & R. P. Eales & E. Daly & J. Baker & A. Murdoch & C. Hill & U. Ojike & T. Karpouzoglou, 2012. "Spatial Representation And Specification Of Ecosystem Services: A Methodology Using Land Use/Land Cover Data And Stakeholder Engagement," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 1-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:14:y:2012:i:01:n:s1464333212500019
    DOI: 10.1142/S1464333212500019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333212500019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1464333212500019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phillips, Peter M. & João, Elsa, 2017. "Land use planning and the ecosystem approach: An evaluation of case study planning frameworks against the Malawi Principles," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 460-480.
    2. Souza, Barbara A. & Rosa, Josianne C.S. & Siqueira-Gay, Juliana & Sánchez, Luis E., 2021. "Mitigating impacts on ecosystem services requires more than biodiversity offsets," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Massoni, Emma Soy & Barton, David N. & Rusch, Graciela M. & Gundersen, Vegard, 2018. "Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PC), pages 502-516.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:14:y:2012:i:01:n:s1464333212500019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.