IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijtafx/v03y2000i02ns0219024900000097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profiling Neural Networks For Option Pricing

Author

Listed:
  • A. CARELLI

    (Banca Intesa-Risk Management and Research, Via Clerici 4, 20121 Milano, Italy)

  • S. SILANI

    (Dipartimento Di Informatica, Sistemistica e Comunicazione, Viale Sarca 202, 20126 Milano, Italy)

  • F. STELLA

    (Dipartimento Di Informatica, Sistemistica e Comunicazione, Viale Sarca 202, 20126 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

In recent years the problem of option pricing has received increasing interest from both financial institutions and academics. It is well known that conventional modeling techniques for option pricing have inherent, persistent and systematic biases which are mainly due to the assumption of constant volatility for prices associated with the underlying financial instrument. Nowadays, there is strong and increasing evidence that financial markets are far from being stationary and then, whenever dealing with option pricing, we have to take into account the market heteroschedasticity. A possible approach for dealing with non-constant volatility relies on the modeling of the basic characteristics named implied volatility. Unfortunately this task is extremely complex and parametric models are not available. In this paper the authors discuss how models from the class of Feedforward Neural Networks can be exploited for approaching the task of implied volatility modeling. In particular the paper shows how the main techniques from the nonlinear regression framework can be exploited when models from the class of Feedforward Neural Networks are used. Indeed, in such a case the paucity of data, which can be used for the network training, and the particular structure of Feedforward Neural Networks make the modeling task numerically complex. The authors discuss how the nonlinear regression technique named profile can be exploited for selecting the optimal network's structure and evaluating its numeical properties. To this end, a numerical procedure for empirical model building, in the case of Feedforward Neural Networks, has been developed. Results are evaluated through an ad-hoc procedure which utilizes the estimated implied volatility surface for pricing general contingent claims. Numerical experiments, in the case of the USD/DEM options, are presented and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Carelli & S. Silani & F. Stella, 2000. "Profiling Neural Networks For Option Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 183-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:03:y:2000:i:02:n:s0219024900000097
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219024900000097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219024900000097
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219024900000097?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johannes Ruf & Weiguan Wang, 2019. "Neural networks for option pricing and hedging: a literature review," Papers 1911.05620, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    2. Anindya Goswami & Sharan Rajani & Atharva Tanksale, 2020. "Data-Driven Option Pricing using Single and Multi-Asset Supervised Learning," Papers 2008.00462, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    3. Fei Chen & Charles Sutcliffe, 2012. "Pricing And Hedging Short Sterling Options Using Neural Networks," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 128-149, April.
    4. Julia Bennell & Charles Sutcliffe, 2004. "Black–Scholes versus artificial neural networks in pricing FTSE 100 options," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(4), pages 243-260, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:03:y:2000:i:02:n:s0219024900000097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijtaf/ijtaf.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.