IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v19y2020i06ns0219622020500364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Evaluate the Overall Performance of Public Emergency Departments: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Ortiz-Barrios

    (Department of Industrial Management, Agroindustry and Operations, Universidad de la Costa CUC, 58th Street # 55-66, Barranquilla, Colombia)

  • Juan-Jose Alfaro-Saiz

    (Research Centre on Production Management and Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera S/N, Edificio 8G, Acceso D Planta 1 Valencia, 46022, Spain)

Abstract

Performance evaluation is relevant for supporting managerial decisions related to the improvement of public emergency departments (EDs). As different criteria from ED context and several alternatives need to be considered, selecting a suitable Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach has become a crucial step for ED performance evaluation. Although some methodologies have been proposed to address this challenge, a more complete approach is still lacking. This paper bridges this gap by integrating three potent MCDM methods. First, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is used to determine the criteria and sub-criteria weights under uncertainty, followed by the interdependence evaluation via fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (FDEMATEL). The fuzzy logic is merged with AHP and DEMATEL to illustrate vague judgments. Finally, the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is used for ranking EDs. This approach is validated in a real 3-ED cluster. The results revealed the critical role of Infrastructure (21.5%) in ED performance and the interactive nature of Patient safety (C+R=12.771). Furthermore, this paper evidences the weaknesses to be tackled for upgrading the performance of each ED.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Ortiz-Barrios & Juan-Jose Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Evaluate the Overall Performance of Public Emergency Departments: A Case Study," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1485-1548, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:19:y:2020:i:06:n:s0219622020500364
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622020500364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622020500364
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622020500364?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Lombardi Netto & Valerio Antonio Pamplona Salomon & Miguel Angel Ortiz Barrios, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Green Bonds: Hybrid Multi-Method Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Jose Martino Neto & Valerio Antonio Pamplona Salomon & Miguel Angel Ortiz-Barrios & Antonella Petrillo, 2023. "Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 831-852, July.
    3. Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios & Dayana Milena Coba-Blanco & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz & Daniela Stand-González, 2021. "Process Improvement Approaches for Increasing the Response of Emergency Departments against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-31, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:19:y:2020:i:06:n:s0219622020500364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.