IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v14y2015i01ns0219622014500874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological Innovation, Product Life Cycle and Market Power: A Real Options Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson T. S. Cheng

    (Department of International Business, Soochow University, No. 56, Section 1, Guiyang Street, Taipei 10048, Taiwan, ROC)

  • I-Ming Jiang

    (Faculty of Finance, College of Management, Yuan Ze University. No. 135, Yuan-Tung Road, Chung-Li, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan, ROC)

  • Yu-Hong Liu

    (Faculty of Department of Accountancy, Graduate Institute of Finance & Banking, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, 70101, Taiwan, ROC)

Abstract

This paper employs a real options approach to analyze optimal investment decisions. When investment projects have the characteristics of irreversibility, uncertainty and the option to wait or exit, the traditional net present value (NPV) method would underestimate the value of investment, since it neglects the values of timing and operational flexibility. The distinctive feature of this paper is that the effects of product life cycle (PLC) as well as market power are incorporated into the model. In addition, and different to the approach in Liaoet al.[Optimal investment decision and product life cycle: A real options approach,Sun Yat-Sen Management Review 11(3) (2003) 1–36], we introduce the concept of technological innovation into the model. It is shown that the optimal waiting time for the investment is longer than both those in the American call options model of McDonald and Siegel [The value of waiting to invest,Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(4) (1986) 707–727], which does not incorporate dividend yield, and Liaoet al.[Optimal investment decision and product life cycle: A real options approach,Sun Yat-Sen Management Review 11(3) (2003) 1–36], but is shorter than that in Dixit and Pindyck's [Investment under Uncertainty(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994)] model, which incorporates dividend yield. Finally, a comparative static is used to analyze the determinants of optimal investment decisions. Our results indicate that the investment-ratio threshold will be higher, and thus the optimal entry time for an investment will be delayed, when (1) the PLC is longer, (2) the uncertainty is greater, (3) the discounting rate is higher, (4) market power is larger, (5) jump size intensity is stronger and (6) the payoff out ratio (R&D/revenue) is larger.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson T. S. Cheng & I-Ming Jiang & Yu-Hong Liu, 2015. "Technological Innovation, Product Life Cycle and Market Power: A Real Options Approach," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(01), pages 93-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:14:y:2015:i:01:n:s0219622014500874
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622014500874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622014500874
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622014500874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arif Khan, Muhammad & Qin, Xuezhi & Jebran, Khalil & Ullah, Irfan, 2020. "Uncertainty and R&D investment: Does product market competition matter?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    2. Sungmoon Jung & Gihyun Kwak, 2018. "Firm Characteristics, Uncertainty and Research and Development (R&D) Investment: The Role of Size and Innovation Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Xu, Jiuping & Gao, Wen & Xie, Heping & Dai, Jingqi & Lv, Chengwei & Li, Meihui, 2018. "Integrated tech-paradigm based innovative approach towards ecological coal mining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 297-308.
    4. Yuhong Liu & I-Ming Jiang & Meng-I Tsai, 2019. "Influence of Managers’ Subjective Judgments on Project Abandonment Decision Making," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 419-443, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:14:y:2015:i:01:n:s0219622014500874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.