IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v06y2002i03ns1363919602000616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technology Choices For Sustainable Industrial Production: Transitions In Metal Making

Author

Listed:
  • ELLEN H.M. MOORS

    (Department of Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute, University of Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 8, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • PHILIP J. VERGRAGT

    (Department of Design for Sustainability, Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, NL-2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Many firms have been taking up the environmental challenge, primarily by implementing incremental technological changes in their production systems. We believe that incremental innovations are no longer enough. Instead, radical innovations in industrial production are necessary for achieving high-level sustainability goals. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to assess how industrial production can be managed towards sustainability goals, by focusing on technological innovations of large-scale, process-oriented firms. We focus on technology choice processes at the micro level that lead to innovations in the metals production industry. Insights into these choice processes could inform policy for promoting more sustainable industrial production.We first conceptualise "incremental" and "radical" innovations according to a technological criterion. Next, a systems-network conceptual framework is presented and applied to the analysis of technology choice processes within two steel producing firms. We argue that the awareness of a crisis, due to increased external pressures upon the production system, is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for radical innovations to be developed and implemented. Furthermore, the availability of a mature firm-internal technology network is a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition for the development of radical innovations. Heterogeneous, informal interactions with firm-external actors are also important. A high degree of technical or organisational embeddedness of the industrial production system seems to complicate the implementation of radical innovations. These options are often implemented when firms are growing.The empirical studies and conceptual framework generate conclusions about policy interventions aimed at transition to radical innovations. These interventions should be focused on the sensitivity of large firms to external pressure. In addition, more outsiders should be enrolled in the technology networks within firms. Further, the firm management should reinforce existing, firm-internal technology networks by including a high density of heterogeneous specialists. Finally, governments should tune their technology policy on business expanding programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellen H.M. Moors & Philip J. Vergragt, 2002. "Technology Choices For Sustainable Industrial Production: Transitions In Metal Making," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 277-299.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:06:y:2002:i:03:n:s1363919602000616
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919602000616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919602000616
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919602000616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Kiel & Julian M. Müller & Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2017. "Sustainable Industrial Value Creation: Benefits And Challenges Of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(08), pages 1-34, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:06:y:2002:i:03:n:s1363919602000616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.