IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/igtrxx/v27y2025i01ns0219198924500129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: Hα-Essential Equilibria

Author

Listed:
  • Papatya Duman

    (Department of Economics, Paderborn University, Paderborn 33098, Germany)

  • Walter Trockel

    (Center for Mathematical Economics (IMW), Bielefeld University, Bielefeld 33615, Germany)

Abstract

Nash’s [1953] demand game models the second step in a “two-move game†that formalizes his “Negotiation Model†. Nash claimed for any two-person bargaining game (S,d) the existence of a unique stable equilibrium of its associated second move demand game that by its payoff vector supports the symmetric Nash solution of that bargaining game.Nash’s negotiation game is considered the first contribution to the Nash program. Only weaker versions of stability than that claimed by Nash have been formally proven later by other authors. However, Nash’s request for “studying the relative stabilities†of the demand game’s equilibria has never been complied with. By performing that task, we establish analogous stability results for all generalized Nash solutions and thereby disprove Nash’s “unique stability†claim.Furthermore, we explain the impact of our result on the Nash solution with endogenous variable threats (NBWT) of the two move negotiation game, which is defined as the symmetric Nash solution of that bargaining game (S,d∗) whose status quo point d∗ is the unique payoff vector of the payoff-equivalent equilibria of the first move threat game.

Suggested Citation

  • Papatya Duman & Walter Trockel, 2025. "Nash Smoothing on the Test Bench: Hα-Essential Equilibria," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 27(01), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:27:y:2025:i:01:n:s0219198924500129
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219198924500129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219198924500129
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219198924500129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:27:y:2025:i:01:n:s0219198924500129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/igtr/igtr.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.