Author
Listed:
- Zhuoqun ZHANG
(Research Institute for Ecological Civilization, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, CASS Thinktank for Eco-civilization Studies, No. 27 Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100710, China)
- Tao ZHANG
(Institute of Quantitative & Technological Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 5 Jianguomennei Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100732, China)
- Mengdi SONG
(Institute of Quantitative & Technological Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, 5 Jianguomennei Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100732, China)
- Kuanbin LIU
(College of Economics and Management, Southwest University, No. 2 Tiansheng Road, Beibei District, Chongqing 400715, China)
Abstract
The philosophy of innovative, coordinated, green, open and inclusive development, collectively referred to as the new development philosophy, is an important component of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialist Economy with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era. It plays a vital role in China’s efforts to resolve problems in economic development and cultivate new advantages. Based on a keen understanding of the new development philosophy, we review the literature on the evaluation of a single indicator of the five dimensions of philosophy and that on a comprehensive evaluation of all the indicators of philosophy. The results show varied depths of research in single-indicator evaluation, and a lack of systematic study on comprehensive evaluation. We propose a multi-tier (macro–micro)-indicator evaluation system of new development philosophy, and recommend to establish a smart evaluation platform by integrating big data with traditional data, which will serve as a foundation and provide reference for the development of a scientific, well-conceived indicator evaluation system of new development philosophy that can guide the practice.
Suggested Citation
Zhuoqun ZHANG & Tao ZHANG & Mengdi SONG & Kuanbin LIU, 2020.
"A Review of the Research on the Indicator Evaluation of the New Development Philosophy,"
Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(04), pages 1-17, December.
Handle:
RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:08:y:2020:i:04:n:s2345748120500232
DOI: 10.1142/S2345748120500232
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:08:y:2020:i:04:n:s2345748120500232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/cjues/cjues.shtml .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.