IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/apjorx/v32y2015i02ns0217595915500074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of an Analytic Network Process and Monte Carlo Analysis in New Product Formula Selection Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Ratapol Wudhikarn

    (College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, 239, Huay Kaew Road, T. Suthep, A. Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200, Thailand)

  • Nopasit Chakpitak

    (College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, 239, Huay Kaew Road, T. Suthep, A. Muang, Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200, Thailand)

  • Gilles Neubert

    (LSTI, ESC Ecole Supérieure de Commerce Saint-Etienne, 51-53 cours Fauriel, BP 29 42009 Saint-Etienne cedex 2, France)

Abstract

One crucial matter in routine life is decision-making. Although decision-making in everyday life appears to be easily dealt with by one-on-one comparisons, the same is not true with decision-making in business. In business management decisions, problems are more complicated than those in individual life because most business situations fall into the category of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. Therefore, appropriate multi-criteria decision methods should be carefully selected to solve these problems. This study uses the analytic network process (ANP), one of the widely available multi-criteria decision methods. However, this popular method generally ignores the uncertainty inherent in the input data. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved process that considers uncertainty by using Monte Carlo analysis with input values then applied to the ANP procedures. This proposed method is implemented by a real business that produces roof tiles; the primary goal of the study is to select among newly developed roof formulas by considering the uncertainty and interrelation among decision criteria and elements as well as alternatives. The outcomes of study accurately rank the new product formulas. Furthermore, the results of improved method differ the rankings produced by the original ANP. The observed dissimilarities mainly result from uncertainty consideration discussed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratapol Wudhikarn & Nopasit Chakpitak & Gilles Neubert, 2015. "Use of an Analytic Network Process and Monte Carlo Analysis in New Product Formula Selection Decisions," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(02), pages 1-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:32:y:2015:i:02:n:s0217595915500074
    DOI: 10.1142/S0217595915500074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217595915500074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0217595915500074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Li & Guoyan Zhao & Pan Wu & Ju Qiu, 2022. "An Integrated Gray DEMATEL and ANP Method for Evaluating the Green Mining Performance of Underground Gold Mines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Iraj Mohammadfam & Ali Asghar Khajevandi & Hesam Dehghani & Mohammad Babamiri & Maryam Farhadian, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Human Reliability in the Mining Process Design Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Babak Daneshvar Rouyendegh & Şeyda Savalan, 2022. "An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Hybrid Methodology to Analyze Agricultural Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Changlu Zhang & Jian Zhang & Qiong Yang, 2022. "Identifying Critical Risk Factors in Green Product Certification Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:32:y:2015:i:02:n:s0217595915500074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/apjor/apjor.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.