IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v35y2012i1p100-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI): Controversy and Proposal for Market-Based Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Randall Guttery
  • Enya (Min) He
  • Stephen Poe

Abstract

A Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI) transaction arises when a life insurance policy is effectively procured by a stranger, usually a third-party investor unrelated to the insured. Despite the growing frequency and popularity of STOLI transactions, there has been much discussion, but a lack of academic research, on the issues and challenges they have generated. The purpose of this research is to shed some light on this innovative insurance transaction by providing a clearer understanding of the controversy created by the STOLI phenomenon, and to argue that regulatory action aimed at restricting or prohibiting these transactions seems unnecessary. After examining the controversy generated by STOLI transactions from the perspective of consumers, insurance carriers, and state insurance regulators, we review the primary initiatives to regulate STOLI transactions, analyze the concerns that have been raised about these transactions, and conclude with proposals for market-based solutions and other reforms to address these concerns and other issues that have given rise to the STOLI controversy.

Suggested Citation

  • Randall Guttery & Enya (Min) He & Stephen Poe, 2012. "Stranger-Originated Life Insurance (STOLI): Controversy and Proposal for Market-Based Solutions," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 35(1), pages 100-117.
  • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:35:y:2012:i:1:p:100-117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/351GHP.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oytun Haçarız & Torsten Kleinow & Angus S. Macdonald & Pradip Tapadar & R. Guy Thomas, 2020. "Will genetic test results be monetized in life insurance?," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 379-399, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:35:y:2012:i:1:p:100-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.