IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v16y1993i2p59-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost Differences of Distribution Systems by Line in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry

Author

Listed:
  • George B. Flanigan
  • Daniel T. Winkler
  • Joseph E. Johnson

Abstract

This study identifies changes in aggregate market share between 1976 and 1988 for property and liability companies classified by distribution system. Evidence is presented that distribution system type produces differences in relative total expense levels. Market share changes suggest independent agency companies are most effective in lines where claimed higher levels of service are important, such as in workers’ compensation and the commercial insurance lines. The independent agency companies have been less effective in maintaining market share in standardized lines such as homeowners and personal automobile. In standardized lines, cost appears more important and claimed higher levels of service and professionalism are less likely to have an impact.

Suggested Citation

  • George B. Flanigan & Daniel T. Winkler & Joseph E. Johnson, 1993. "Cost Differences of Distribution Systems by Line in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 16(2), pages 59-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:16:y:1993:i:2:p:59-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laureen Regan, 1999. "Expense Ratios Across Insurance Distribution Systems: An Analysis By Line Of Business," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 2(2), pages 44-59, January.
    2. Hecht, Jason, 1999. "Modeling market shares of the leading personal automobile insurance companies," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 279-296, May.
    3. Annette Hofmann & Julia K. Neumann & David Pooser, 2018. "Plea for Uniform Regulation and Challenges of Implementing the New Insurance Distribution Directive," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(4), pages 740-769, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:16:y:1993:i:2:p:59-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.