IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v186y2023i4p978-1018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Religion

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Pelizzo
  • Nygmetzhan Kuzenbayev

Abstract

By equating the traditional mindset with traditional beliefs (in magic, ritual, superstitions, etc.), several studies have consistently shown that such beliefs significantly influence people's political behavior and preferences. While these studies have highlighted the political consequences of a traditional mindset in several countries from the Global South, they nevertheless have little to say as to whether holding superstitious beliefs (e.g., believing in fortune tellers, horoscopes, or lucky charms) has certain political implications for countries in the Global North. In this article, we explore whether the traditional mindset has political consequences even in an industrially advanced Germany. We present an analysis of data from the German General Social Survey (GESIS 2019) showing that superstitious voters have less trust in the political system, are more inclined to think that Hitler would be remembered as a good stateman if he had not perpetrated the Holocaust, that the Nazi regime also had a good side, and that the Jews are different and, in any case, have too much influence. Hence, dissemination of superstitious beliefs could make right‐wing populists more electorally appealing and successful than they once were. We believe our findings to be of some importance as they show that if the proliferation of superstitious beliefs continues unchecked, they may transform our political systems in ways that policy makers and democratic forces should strive to avoid. Al equiparar la mentalidad tradicional con las creencias tradicionales (en magia, rituales, supersticiones, etc.), varios estudios han demostrado consistentemente que tales creencias influyen significativamente en el comportamiento y las preferencias políticas de las personas. Si bien estos estudios han destacado las consecuencias políticas de una mentalidad tradicional en varios países del Sur Global, tienen poco que decir sobre si mantener creencias supersticiosas (por ejemplo, creer en adivinos, horóscopos o amuletos de la suerte) tiene ciertas implicaciones políticas. para los países del Norte Global. En este artículo exploramos si la mentalidad tradicional tiene consecuencias políticas incluso en una Alemania industrialmente avanzada. Presentamos un análisis de datos del Estudio Social General Alemán (GESIS 2019) que muestra que los votantes supersticiosos tienen menos confianza en el sistema político, están más inclinados a pensar que Hitler sería recordado como un buen estadista si no hubiera perpetrado el Holocausto, que el régimen nazi también tenía un lado bueno, y que los judíos son diferentes y, en cualquier caso, tienen demasiada influencia. Por lo tanto, la difusión de creencias supersticiosas podría hacer que los populistas de derecha sean más atractivos y exitosos electoralmente de lo que alguna vez fueron. Creemos que nuestros hallazgos son de cierta importancia ya que muestran que si la proliferación de creencias supersticiosas continúa sin control, pueden transformar nuestros sistemas políticos de maneras que los responsables políticos y las fuerzas democráticas deberían esforzarse por evitar. 通过将传统观念模式等同于传统信仰(魔法、仪式、迷信等),多项研究一致表明,此类信仰显著影响人们的政治行为和偏好。尽管这些研究强调了几个全球南方国家中传统观念所产生的政治结果,但却几乎没有研究全球北方国家中持有迷信信仰一事(例如,相信算命者、星座或幸运符)是否具有一定的政治影响。本文中,我们探究了即使在工业发达的德国,传统观念模式是否也会产生政治影响。我们分析了德国综合社会调查(GESIS 2019)数据,分析表明:迷信的选民对政治制度的信任度较低,并且更倾向于认为——如果希特勒没有犯下大屠杀,他将被铭记为一位正派的政治家,纳粹政权也有好的一面,而犹太人是不同的,并且无论如何,犹太人的影响太大了。因此,传播迷信可以使右翼民粹主义者比以往更具有选举吸引力、选举成功率也更高。我们的研究发现具有重要性,因为其表明,如果迷信扩散继续不受控制,则可能会改变我们的政治制度,而这种改变方式是决策者和民主力量应该努力避免的。

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Pelizzo & Nygmetzhan Kuzenbayev, 2023. "Beyond Religion," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 186(4), pages 978-1018, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:186:y:2023:i:4:p:978-1018
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200231203101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200231203101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200231203101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:186:y:2023:i:4:p:978-1018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.