Author
Listed:
- Stephen Collins
- Jeff DeWitt
Abstract
Twitter is regarded today as an essential communication platform of U.S. diplomacy. Of all diplomatic tweets, those published by U.S. presidents carry the greatest weight and hold great potential to influence perceptions of the country. In this study, we conduct cross‐presidential comparative analyses on an original dataset of over 2,000 tweets published by the first two presidents of the Twitter era. In particular, we test the commonly held notion that the substance and tone of Barack Obama's communication reflected positively on America's image abroad, with the potential to expand soft power—a vital foreign policy asset—while Donald Trump's communication reflected negatively on America's image, potentially eroding the nation's image and its soft power. Findings demonstrate that what and how presidents communicate on Twitter may produce profound and disparate impacts on America's image abroad and on U.S. soft power. Twitter es considerado hoy como una plataforma de comunicación esencial de la diplomacia estadounidense. De todos los tuits diplomáticos, los publicados por los presidentes de EE. UU. tienen el mayor peso y tienen un gran potencial para influir en las percepciones del país. En este estudio, llevamos a cabo análisis comparativos entre presidentes en un conjunto de datos original de más de 2000 tuits publicados por los dos primeros presidentes de la era de Twitter. En particular, probamos la noción común de que la sustancia y el tono de la comunicación de Barack Obama se reflejaron positivamente en la imagen de Estados Unidos en el extranjero, con el potencial de expandir el poder blando, un activo vital de la política exterior, mientras que la comunicación de Donald Trump se reflejó negativamente en la imagen de Estados Unidos, potencialmente erosionando la imagen de la nación y su poder blando. Los hallazgos demuestran que qué y cómo se comunican los presidentes en Twitter puede producir impactos profundos y dispares en la imagen de Estados Unidos en el extranjero y en el poder blando de Estados Unidos. 推特如今被视为美国外交的重要传播平台。在所有外交推文中,美国总统发布的推文影响力最大,并在影响该国感知方面存在巨大潜力。本研究中,我们对一项原始数据集进行比较分析,该数据集包括了推特时代下前两位总统发布的2,000多条推文。特别地,我们检验了一个普遍持有的观点,即巴拉克·奥巴马传播的内容和语气对美国的海外形象产生了积极影响,并有可能扩大软实力这一重要的外交政策资产,而唐纳德·特朗普传播的内容和语气对美国形象产生了消极影响,并可能侵蚀了国家形象和软实力。调查结果表明,总统在推特上传播的内容和传播方式可能会对美国的海外形象以及美国的软实力产生深远且迥然不同的影响。
Suggested Citation
Stephen Collins & Jeff DeWitt, 2023.
"Words Matter,"
World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 186(3), pages 530-571, September.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:woraff:v:186:y:2023:i:3:p:530-571
DOI: 10.1177/00438200231161631
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:186:y:2023:i:3:p:530-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.