IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v185y2022i3p471-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Narrative Empathy

Author

Listed:
  • Mark K. McBeth
  • Donna L. Lybecker
  • Jessica M. Sargent

Abstract

Understanding the reasoning behind diverse views grows empathy and can help strengthen democracy. This study examines narratives and their influence on individuals, to see if individuals only empathize with narratives from those with whom they share identity. Using an experimental design, we test empathy with working class climate change narratives. Results showed participants who agreed with anthropogenic climate change, who were given both evidence and a narrative, empathized with the narrator (either an organic farmer or a mechanic) that told a pro‐climate change narrative. The greatest empathy was for the mechanic telling a pro‐climate change narrative. Conversely, participants who did not agree with human‐caused climate change and who were given evidence without narrative had more empathy for the organic farmer (over the mechanic) who told a pro‐climate change narrative. Overall, we found some identity issues negatively influenced empathy, but we also found examples where individuals moved beyond their identity. Comprender el razonamiento detrás de los diversos puntos de vista aumenta la empatía y puede ayudar a fortalecer la democracia. Este estudio examina las narrativas y su influencia en las personas, para ver si las personas solo sienten empatía por las narrativas de aquellos con quienes comparten identidad. Usando un diseño experimental, probamos la empatía con las narrativas del cambio climático de la clase trabajadora. Los resultados mostraron participantes que estaban de acuerdo con el cambio climático antropogénico, a quienes se les dio evidencia y una narrativa, empatizaron con el narrador (ya sea un agricultor orgánico o un mecánico) que contó una narrativa a favor del cambio climático. La mayor empatía fue para el mecánico contando una narrativa a favor del cambio climático. Por el contrario, los participantes que no estaban de acuerdo con el cambio climático causado por el hombre y que recibieron evidencia sin narración, tenían más empatía por el agricultor orgánico (sobre el mecánico) que contó una narrativa a favor del cambio climático. En general, encontramos algunos problemas de identidad que influyeron negativamente en la empatía, pero también encontramos ejemplos en los que las personas se movieron más allá de su identidad. 理解不同观点背后的推理能培养同理心,并有助于加强民主。本研究分析了叙事及其对个体的影响,以了解个体是否只对拥有共同身份的叙事者的叙事产生共情。通过使用一项实验设计,我们检验了对工人阶级气候变化叙事产生的共情。结果显示,认为气候变化由人类造成并且被提供证据及叙事的那部分参与者,与讲述支持气候变化叙事的叙事者(有机农民或机械工)产生共情。讲述支持气候变化叙事的机械工引起了最大的共情。相反,不认为气候变化由人引起并且被提供证据(无叙事)的参与者,对讲述支持气候变化叙事的有机农民(而不是机械工)产生更多的共情。总体而言,我们发现,一些身份问题会对共情产生负面影响,但我们也发现了个体观点不受身份影响的例子。

Suggested Citation

  • Mark K. McBeth & Donna L. Lybecker & Jessica M. Sargent, 2022. "Narrative Empathy," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 185(3), pages 471-499, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:3:p:471-499
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200221107018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221107018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200221107018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:3:p:471-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.